arXiv Machine Learning By Si-Yang Liu, Han-Jia Ye

TabSwift: An Efficient Tabular Foundation Model with Row-Wise Attention

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 07345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models, exemplified by TabPFN, perform prediction via in-context learning, inferring test labels directly from labeled training examples.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 24

Tydra: An Efficient Hybrid Model for Tabular Data

Tydra is a hybrid Transformer‑State Space Model that interleaves attention and SSM layers for tabular in‑context learning. It achieves a 30% reduction in inference time compared to the Transformer‑only TabPFN while preserving most of its predictive performance. On 30 OpenML datasets, Tydra also outperforms a Hydra model that is roughly ten times larger, demonstrating that hybrid architectures can balance accuracy and efficiency for tabular foundation models.

By Mieszko Komisarczyk, Saurabh Mathur, Maurice Kraus, Sriraam Natarajan, Kristian Kersting
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

SOMTab: Set-Order Mamba for Efficient Tabular In-Context Learning

SOMTab is a Set-Order Mamba architecture designed for efficient tabular in-context learning. It separates representation construction from query-conditioned retrieval, using Mamba-based state‑space mixing to build compact row and column representations while retaining attention for final prediction. The model, along with a synthetic prior called DCH‑TailMix, achieves performance comparable to Transformer‑based tabular foundation models but with faster inference and lower GPU memory usage.

By Hao Wang, Siyu Zhang, Wei Ma
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

What Do Tabular Foundation Models Compute In Context? In-Situ Representation Refinement through Attention-Gated Updates

The paper introduces RefineICL, an attention‑gated, feed‑forward‑network‑free framework that refines representations in situ for tabular foundation models. By using support labels to guide episode‑specific updates, the method transfers learned corrections to unlabeled queries without altering model parameters, achieving state‑of‑the‑art performance on AMLB29 and TabArena benchmarks. Experiments and internal interventions demonstrate that intermediate support updates are essential for constructing task‑specific predictors in context.

By Tian Zhou, Beverly Jin, Linxiao Yang, Xue Wang, Wenwei Wang, Bingqing Peng, Mengni Ye, Jinjie Gu, Liang Sun
arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

Benchmarking Attention for Tabular Foundation Models

The paper introduces a reproducible benchmark for evaluating attention mechanisms in tabular foundation models, focusing on the distinct row and column attention patterns that differ from language model attention. It compares several backends—Torch SDPA, FlashAttention variants, vLLM, and SageAttention—across realistic tabular shapes on A100, H100, and B200 GPUs, revealing that optimal backend choice varies by attention type, hardware, and model specifics. The study finds FlashAttention generally performs best, but CuDNN can outperform it for column attention on longer sequences, while SageAttention excels for large row sequences beyond 16k rows.

By Maximilian Schambach, Clemens Biehl, Sam Thelin