arXiv Computation and Language By Zifan Peng, Jingyi Zheng, Yule Liu, Huaiyu Jia, Qiming Ye, Jingyu Liu, Xufeng Yang, Mingchen Li, Qingyuan Gong, Xuechao Wang, Xinlei He

TxSum: User-Centered Ethereum Transaction Understanding with Micro-Level Semantic Grounding

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

TxSum introduces a user-centered approach to understanding Ethereum transactions by providing structured, risk-aware explanations grounded at the token‑flow level. The authors built a dataset of 187 complex transactions with 2,375 token‑flow annotations and transaction‑level summaries, and developed MATEX, a multi‑agent framework that retrieves external knowledge and audits explanations for factual consistency. MATEX outperforms existing baselines, improving user comprehension from 52.9% to 76.5% and increasing malicious‑transaction rejection from 36.0% to 88.0% while keeping false‑rejection rates low.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

Explaining AI Agents Through Execution Traces

arXiv:2609.06063v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI Agents are increasingly deployed in real-world settings, where they interact with external tools and make sequential decisions with limited human ov...

By Vittoria Vineis, Fabiano Veglianti, Lorenzo Antonelli, Claudia Di Carlo, Matteo Silvestri, Gabriele Tolomei
arXiv AI
Jul 21

Detection, Attribution, Narration: An End-to-End Pipeline for Explainable Money Mule Identification

arXiv:2607. 17586v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Money mule accounts are critical facilitators of financial fraud, yet detecting them at scale remains challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of transactional and behavioural data.

By Yuge Zhang, Yuanxing Zhang, Yichao Jin, Khairul Amsyar Mohd Razis, Nicholas Qi An Choo, Kai Yin Anders Wong, Xinyan Tang, Kenneth Zhu Ke, Wee Keong Dennis Lee, Jingyuan Zhao
arXiv AI
Oct 21

TxnQA: Benchmarking Analytical Reasoning and Evidence Grounding over Transaction Event Sequences

TxnQA is a new analytical QA benchmark that tests reasoning and evidence grounding over transaction event sequences. It contains 27 task families with 81 templates and a 5‑scenario fraud‑risk reasoning suite built on synthetic, privacy‑mitigated transaction data. The benchmark evaluates models using format‑following rate, conditional content accuracy, and end‑to‑end correctness, revealing distinct bottlenecks in schema compliance, semantic calculation, and evidence attribution.

By Rabimba Karanjai, Yiming Bian, Yun-Shiuan Chuang, Jenna L. Ballard, Zijie Pan, Shivani Shekhar, Yixi Li, Yirou Ge, Avinash Thangali, Richard Williamson, Linsey Pang, Prakhar Mehrotra
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

GRACE: Step-Level Benchmark for Faithful Reasoning over Context

GRACE is a step‑level benchmark for evaluating the faithfulness of chain‑of‑thought reasoning over context. It provides human annotations for each step in CoT traces from 10 models across 4 datasets, labeling faithfulness, error category, and natural‑language explanations. The benchmark introduces a data‑driven taxonomy that splits errors into GRACE‑Inference (deductive) and GRACE‑Grounding (factual) tracks, each with four categories, and demonstrates that incorporating step‑level faithfulness signals can improve downstream accuracy and reasoning reliability.

By Hoang Pham, Dong Le, Anh Tuan Luu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 29

Beyond LLM Wrappers: Context Engineering and the Three-Engine Architecture for Reliable Financial AI

The paper proposes a three‑engine architecture for reliable financial AI, combining a financial knowledge graph, a deterministic optimization engine, and a multi‑agent LLM layer. A coordination layer called context engineering selects and validates context from ERP systems, tools, and tenants to ensure numerical accuracy, traceability, and auditability. Observations from 15 deployments show that graph‑backed multi‑agent validation can reduce hallucination rates from 7‑9% to below 1%, while reusable mappings and validation policies cut deployment time from six to two weeks.