arXiv Machine Learning By Giorgia Adorni, Michela Papandrea, Battista Rimoldi, Tiziano Leidi

TTM-Bench: A Framework for Text-to-Music System Performance Benchmarking

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

TTM-Bench is a framework designed to benchmark text-to-music systems by establishing a common protocol for reproducible evaluation. It measures performance along two axes: musical-content alignment—assessed through semantic, genre, and musical-descriptor agreement scores against a shared musical specification—and computational efficiency, which includes generation latency, real-time factor, resource usage for local models, and cost for hosted services. A preliminary case study using TTM-Bench shows that higher alignment does not necessarily mean lower computational demands, underscoring the need for distinct, interpretable metrics.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Oct 27

Gangqinpu: A Multi-Genre, Multi-Task Piano Dataset with Aligned Audio, MIDI, and Musical Scores

Gangqinpu is a large, multi‑genre piano dataset that provides aligned audio, MIDI, and musical scores for 18,786 pieces, covering pop, classical, jazz, folk/traditional, rock, and blues. The dataset includes automatic note‑level alignments, beat/downbeat annotations, genre labels, and a binary classifier to filter non‑expressive performances. It is designed to reduce data leakage with ASAP splits and has shown cross‑dataset improvements in beat tracking and in‑domain gains for transcription and expressive performance rendering.

By Wei Zeng, Anvay Mathur, Ye Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 16

MUUNRiver-Bench: Diagnosing Relation-Dependent Music Retrieval with Multimodal Instructions

MUUNRiver-Bench is a diagnostic benchmark for music retrieval that uses natural‑language instructions to define relevance for reference‑audio queries. It contains 3,440 tracks across 13 genres and 116 sub‑genres and covers seven tasks such as similar‑music, style‑preserving lyric‑rewriting, cover, and segment retrieval. Experiments with six models in eight configurations show that acoustic encoders favor local identity while text‑aligned encoders favor semantic relations, and that instruction‑aware and audio‑text fusion systems do not consistently outperform their backbones.

By Zhancheng Guo, Congren Dai, Shangda Wu, Jianhuai Hu, Danni Zhao, Xiaobing Li, Maosong Sun
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 28

Don't CLAP: Are Music-Text Models Bag-of-Words?

The paper evaluates whether music‑text models truly capture fine‑grained musical meaning by introducing attribute‑swap perturbations that exchange properties such as timbre or order between instruments in a caption. Four contrastive models and one large audio‑language model were tested to see if they would score higher on the original caption than on the perturbed one. The results show that none of the contrastive models reliably distinguish the captions, and the audio‑language model’s advantage stems mainly from language priors, indicating that CLAP scores behave like a bag‑of‑words and fail to reflect attribute bindings.

By Yuan-Chiao Cheng, Alexander Lerch
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 22

Pushing the Frontier of Full-Song Generation: Hierarchical Autoregressive Planning Meets Flow-Matching Rendering

In this report, we present a unified song generation framework capable of producing high-quality full-length music from lyrics, text descriptions, and musical attributes. The proposed framework supports three tasks: Lyrics-to-Song Generation, which generates complete songs from text descriptions, lyrics, and musical attributes; Instrumental Music Generation, which creates music without vocals; and Cover Song Generation, which reinterprets existing songs with different styles while preserving their melodic content.