arXiv:2507. 10142v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) has achieved strong performance in simulated benchmarks, yet real deployments often violate the assumptions under which algorithms are designed and evaluated.
By Siyi Hu, Mohamad A Hady, Jianglin Qiao, Jimmy Cao, Mahardhika Pratama, Ryszard Kowalczyk
arXiv:2606. 24601v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) addresses the problem of training multiple agents that pursue collaborative, competitive, or mixed objectives.
By Anurag Akula, Satheesh K. Perepu, Abhishek Sarkar, Kaushik Dey
arXiv:2608. 11658v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many reinforcement learning systems, from fleet management to traffic signal control, must serve an objective that changes dynamically after deployment, and retraining a policy for each new objective is prohibitively expensive.
By Zijian Zhao, Sen Li
arXiv:2606. 09825v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training reinforcement learning (RL) policies from scratch is costly: it requires careful reward and environment design, extensive tuning, and substantial computation.
By Anton Bolychev, Georgiy Malaniya, Sinan Ibrahim, Pavel Osinenko
arXiv:2607. 25663v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformer adaptation is typically distributed across model depth, even when the intended change is narrow.
By Rebecca Ramnauth, Brian Scassellati
arXiv:2607. 21646v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ensuring safety in reinforcement learning under nonstationarity requires determining whether a learning system can safely adapt to forecasted environmental change within the required recovery horizon.
By Timothy Tomashevskiy