arXiv:2606. 25073v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), from a deployment perspective, it is challenging and expensive to train agents from scratch for each new environment or task.
By Animesh Animesh, Satheesh K Perepu, Kaushik Dey
arXiv:2605.13054v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Cross-domain offline reinforcement learning learns a target policy from pre-collected source and target datasets with different dynamics. Whe...
By Minung Kim, Jeongmo Kim, Gwanwoo Choi, Seungyul Han
The paper investigates zero‑shot task generalisation in offline multi‑agent reinforcement learning by extending sequence‑modeling architectures to support multi‑task observation and action spaces and variable agent counts. It finds that increasing task diversity, rather than merely enlarging the dataset, is the key driver for robust zero‑shot transfer. Experiments on four challenging environments show a 3.2× mean improvement on held‑out tasks compared to single‑task models and outperform strong behaviour‑cloning baselines.
By Oussama Hidaoui, Omer Ebead, Ulrich Armel Mbou Sob, Siddarth Singh, Juan Claude Formanek, Felix Chalumeau, Omayma Mahjoub, Sasha Abramowitz, Ruan John de Kock, Wiem Khlifi, Louay Ben Nessir, Simon Verster Du Toit, Daniel Rajaonarivonivelomanantsoa, Asim Awad Osman, Arnol Manuel Fokam, Refiloe Shabe, Arnu Pretorius
arXiv:2608.20909v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Offline RL methods commonly jointly train the actor and critic, where the critic is used to guide the actor toward higher-value actions. This coupled l...
By Xuyao Lin, Yixiang Shan, Jinru Duan, Tao Yang, Xinyu Zhao, Runyu Lei, Yiming Zhao, Jiaxin Fan, Zongbao Feng, Peng Jia
arXiv:2606. 26575v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Complex multi-agent control tasks remain challenging for traditional rule-based and model-based approaches, motivating the adoption of learning-based methods.
By Chenlong Liu, Zhuohui Zhang, Xinyan Chen, Zhipeng Wang, Bin Cheng, Bin He
arXiv:2606. 03017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reward transfer in Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is unreliable when policies must generalize to unseen combinations of environment dynamics and task goals.
By Yikang Gui, Bikramjit Banerjee, Prashant Doshi
arXiv:2610.00758v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: By learning transferable rewards, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) enables counterfactual evaluation of agents under modified environments. Such...
By Allen Tran, Jia Wan, Nathan Kallus, Aur\'elien Bibaut
arXiv:2607. 07859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) research has increasingly shifted focus towards alignment, ensuring agents learn behaviors adhering to human values.
By Benjamin Poole, Minwoo Lee
arXiv:2509. 22310v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved impressive results across domains, yet learning an optimal policy typically requires extensive interaction data, limiting practical deployment.
By Bumgeun Park, Donghwan Lee
arXiv:2607. 16090v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transferring policies across domains poses a vital challenge in reinforcement learning, due to the dynamics mismatch between the source and target domains.
By Hanyang Chen, Anirudh Satheesh, Longchao Da, Hua Wei
arXiv:2608. 04934v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training LLM agents commonly relies on supervised fine-tuning from expert trajectories or online reinforcement learning over human-specified tasks with handcrafted verifiers.
By Xuanyu Lei, Yiqi Zhu, Chenliang Li, Kaiming Liu, Peng Li, Ming Yan, Jieping Ye, Ya-Qin Zhang, Yang Liu
arXiv:2608.30067v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: How do LLM agents come to both understand environments they act in and master tasks set within them? Through controlled experiments combining world-m...
By Ruize Xu, Xiao Yu, Yujin Tang, Chenming Shang, Nikhil Singh