arXiv:2608. 03527v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval systems help deep research agents generate high-quality answers by providing relevant documents.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
The paper introduces a method for creating query‑specific rubrics for DeepResearch‑style long‑form report generation by training rubric generators with reinforcement learning. It builds a dataset of queries annotated with human preferences, then uses a hybrid reward that includes preference consistency, format validity, and LLM‑based rubric evaluation. The learned rubrics outperform generic or manually constructed alternatives in distinguishing preferred reports and, when used as rewards, improve performance of both single‑agent and multi‑agent DeepResearch systems.
arXiv:2604. 02091v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Rerankers play a pivotal role in refining retrieval results for Retrieval-Augmented Generation.
arXiv:2607. 10555v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized information retrieval, yet their strictly parametric nature frequently leads to severe factual hallucinations when confronted with complex queries beyond their epistemic boundaries.
arXiv:2609.14412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research agents answer complex questions through iterative loops of searching, reading, and reasoning. Recent work on reasoning-intensive benchmar...
arXiv:2606. 01070v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense retrievers excel at first-stage candidate generation but lack effective reranking in zero-resource settings.
Q2D-Web is a new large‑scale benchmark for agentic Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, featuring a 190 million‑document web corpus and 70 k machine‑reformulated search queries in ten languages. It supplies three sets of relevance judgments—agent citations, production rankings, and a combined set enriched with LLM‑based labels—to evaluate first‑stage retrievers. Experiments on 13 retrievers show consistent ranking across judgment sets but significant variation across domains, languages, and query types, and demonstrate that a carefully sampled sub‑corpus can approximate full‑corpus evaluation with minimal loss in Recall@1000.