arXiv AI

Tool-Adaptive LLM Reranker

arXiv:2607. 10555v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized information retrieval, yet their strictly parametric nature frequently leads to severe factual hallucinations when confronted with complex queries beyond their epistemic boundaries.

arXiv AI

Jul 3

Optimizing RAG Rerankers with LLM Feedback via Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2604. 02091v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Rerankers play a pivotal role in refining retrieval results for Retrieval-Augmented Generation.

By Yuhang Wu, Xiangqing Shen, Fanfan Wang, Cangqi Zhou, Zhen Wu, Xinyu Dai, Rui Xia

llms rag reinforcement-learning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 9

Generative Reasoning Re-ranker

arXiv:2602. 07774v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent studies increasingly explore Large Language Models (LLMs) as a new paradigm for recommendation systems due to their scalability and world knowledge.

By Mingfu Liang, Yufei Li, Jay Xu, Kavosh Asadi, Xi Liu, Shuo Gu, Kaushik Rangadurai, Frank Shyu, Shuaiwen Wang, Song Yang, Zhijing Li, Jiang Liu, Mengying Sun, Fei Tian, Xiaohan Wei, Chonglin Sun, Jacob Tao, Shike Mei, Wenlin Chen, Santanu Kolay, Sandeep Pandey, Hamed Firooz, Luke Simon

llms rag nlp reinforcement-learning fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 15

Optimizing Agentic Reasoning with Retrieval via Synthetic Semantic Information Gain Reward

arXiv:2602. 00845v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agentic reasoning enables large reasoning models (LRMs) to dynamically acquire external knowledge, but yet optimizing the retrieval process remains challenging due to the lack of dense, principled reward signals.

By Senkang Hu, Yong Dai, Yuzhi Zhao, Yihang Tao, Yu Guo, Zhengru Fang, Sam Tak Wu Kwong, Yuguang Fang

rag agents benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 15

Efficient Rationale-based Retrieval: On-policy Distillation from Generative Rerankers based on JEPA

arXiv:2604. 23336v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Unlike traditional fact-based retrieval, rationale-based retrieval typically necessitates cross-encoding of query-document pairs using large language models, incurring substantial computational costs.

By Teng Chen, Sheng Xu, Feixiang Guo, Xiaoyu Wang, Qingqing Gu, Hongyan Li, Luo Ji

llms rag robotics efficiency benchmarks

arXiv AI

Aug 5

Training Documents Reranker with Search Rubrics for Deep Research Agent

arXiv:2608. 03527v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval systems help deep research agents generate high-quality answers by providing relevant documents.

By Wenhan Liu, Yu Lu, Qiaolin Xia, Hui Xu, Tong Zhao, Jian Xi, Yutao Zhu, Haijin Liang, Haibo Shi, Hao Wang, Zhicheng Dou

llms rag agents reinforcement-learning fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 16

RL-Index: Reinforcement Learning for Retrieval Index Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 16316v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieving external knowledge is essential for solving real-world tasks, yet it remains challenging when the relationship between a query and its relevant knowledge involves implicit and complex reasoning beyond surface-level semantic or lexical matching (e.

By Yongjia Lei, Nedim Lipka, Zhisheng Qi, Utkarsh Sahu, Koustava Goswami, Franck Dernoncourt, Ryan A. Rossi, Yu Wang

llms agents reinforcement-learning efficiency benchmarks

arXiv AI

6d ago

CAR: Query-Guided Confidence-Aware Reranking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv:2605. 04495v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) relies on evidence ranking to determine what information is exposed to the generator, yet existing retrieval and reranking methods primarily estimate query--document relevance.

By Zhipeng Song, Yizhi Zhou, Xiangyu Kong, Jiulong Jiao, Xuezhou Ye, Chunqi Gao, Xueqing Shi, Yu Wang, Yuhang Zhou, Heng Qi

llms rag

arXiv AI

Jun 6

Reducing Hallucinations in Complex Question Answering using Simple Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (long version)

arXiv:2606. 05901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed the landscape of Natural Language Processing.

By Christopher J. Wedge, Joshua Stutter, Danny Dixon, Jacek Ca{\l}a

llms rag agents nlp fine-tuning benchmarks safety

arXiv Machine Learning

Aug 12

SearchArt: Training Long-Horizon Search Agent with Scalable Synthetic and Verified Task

arXiv:2607. 24850v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled search agents to autonomously tackle complex tasks across extended search and reasoning horizons.

By Lang Mei, Xiaohan Yu, Chong Chen, Liyan Liu, Xiangnan Chen, Jinchao Ma, Chao Feng, Li Huang, Siyu Mo, Sichen Kang, Yunkun Xu, Zhihan Yang, Zhujun Xue, Jingren Zhang, Qing He, Yingdi Huang, Hao Jiang, Ziao Ma, Zewei Pan, Minhao Sun, Zhuo Tao, Jinzhao Xiao, Gangtao Xin, Huanyao Zhang, Wenjian Zhang, Jiangshan Zhang, Guojie Zhu, Fangzhou Zou, Jiaxin Mao, Wentao Zhang

llms agents reinforcement-learning fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 11

PRInTS: Reward Modeling for Long-Horizon Information Seeking

arXiv:2511. 19314v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Information-seeking is a core capability for AI agents, requiring them to gather and reason over tool-generated information across long trajectories.

By Jaewoo Lee, Archiki Prasad, Justin Chih-Yao Chen, Zaid Khan, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal

llms agents nlp reinforcement-learning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 2

Test-Time Training for Zero-Resource Dense Retrieval Reranking

arXiv:2606. 01070v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense retrievers excel at first-stage candidate generation but lack effective reranking in zero-resource settings.

By Shiyan Liu, Yichen Li

rag benchmarks

Hugging Face Trending Papers

Jul 12

To Answer or to Abstain: Mitigating Search-Agent Hallucinations via Abstention-Aware Reinforcement Learning

Recent advances in equipping Large Language Models (LLMs) with search tools and outcome-reward reinforcement learning (RL) have achieved new state-of-the-art results on open-domain QA tasks. However, we argue that current training paradigms harbor a critical vulnerability: they predominantly reward correct answers but fail to penalize fabricated ones when retrieval fails, thereby implicitly exacerbating hallucinations.

llms agents reinforcement-learning benchmarks safety

Related stories