arXiv AI By Harish Kant Pathak

TRACE: A Governance Framework for Measuring Explainability Debt in Production AI Systems

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces TRACE, a seven-instrument governance framework designed to measure and manage Explainability Debt in production AI systems. Its core metric, the Explainability Debt Score (EDS), tracks the proportion of decisions falling below a defined explainability confidence threshold, while complementary tools such as DART, SHIV, FDE, HVE, AIDE, and ZERO support forecasting, daily validation, drift evaluation, human oversight, audit decisions, and remediation. A twelve‑month case study on a fraud‑detection system demonstrated that TRACE could predict EDS levels months in advance and reveal risk asymmetries invisible to traditional performance metrics.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 18

Governance-as-Code: Translating EU AI Act Technical Requirements into Executable Compliance Pipelines for Generative AI Systems

The paper introduces Governance-as-Code (GaC), a framework that translates the EU AI Act’s technical requirements into 43 machine‑checkable acceptance criteria across six compliance modules. GaC runs within a CI/CD pipeline, producing Article‑indexed audit evidence and providing actual Rego policy code. The authors validate GaC on two enterprise deployments, showing it reproduces manual audit findings—including three penalty‑triggering violations—while reducing audit labor by about 75%.

By Rudrendu Kumar Paul, Sourav Nandy
arXiv AI
Sep 24

Compliant with Local Controls, Collectively Discriminatory. A Governance Architecture for Multi-Agent AI in Regulated Finance

The paper discusses how financial institutions are increasingly using AI agents in areas such as credit, fraud, and compliance, yet current governance focuses only on individual components. It introduces ARIA, a finance‑specific reference architecture that adds six capabilities—policy specification, population‑level monitoring, bounded authority, runtime containment, adaptive policy change, and preserved human oversight—to address the gap of constitutional non‑compositionality. Two simulations demonstrate how local controls can miss collective bias and how observed‑versus‑expected monitoring can provide earlier warnings of drift.

By Jose Manuel de la Chica Rodriguez, Juan Manuel Vera Diaz, Pablo Delgado Romero
arXiv AI
Aug 13

Governing Agentic AI in FinTech

arXiv:2608. 11344v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial institutions are delegating consequential decisions to agentic AI systems that decompose goals, coordinate models and tools, and act with little oversight.

By Henry Han