arXiv AI By Masahiro Yoshida, Atsuya Kobayashi, Kei Tateno, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen

Towards Cognitive Process-Aware Proactive Writing Support

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper proposes a proactive writing support system that infers users’ needs from their writing interactions, using Flower and Hayes’ cognitive process theory as a framework. By mapping six cognitive processes to 14 specific support types and associated interaction behaviors, the authors develop AToM CoWriter, which offers context-aware suggestions without requiring explicit prompts. Two within-subjects studies with 21 participants show that this approach improves expressiveness, idea exploration, and engagement with proactive suggestions.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 23

CoWriter: Guiding Methodological and Synergetic Human-LLM Co-Authoring

CoWriter is a proactive agentic system that adapts expert human co‑authoring methodologies from cognitive science to guide the entire writing workflow and actively encourage user engagement. In an exploratory user study, authors using CoWriter expressed their perspectives more clearly, felt greater ownership of the document, and engaged with the agent 2.2× more often than a standard LLM baseline. External reader judges also rated CoWriter‑generated texts higher in human‑touch qualities such as storytelling and personal experience integration.

By Shmuel Amar, Benjamin Lieber, Ori Shapira, Debanjana Kar, Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein, Yufang Hou, Ido Dagan
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

The Cognitive Cost of LLM Writing: A Reading-Time Comparison with Human Text

The study examines how reading times differ between human-written texts and rewrites generated by large language models (LLMs). Using a RoBERTa-RT model trained on eye-tracking data, the authors compare predicted reading times for 496 paired articles and find that LLM rewrites are shorter overall but have higher predicted reading times per word. These differences correlate with linguistic changes such as longer, less frequent words, greater lexical diversity, and higher contextual predictability.

By Kamer Cekini, Elisabetta Biondi, Chiara Boldrini, Andrea Passarella, Marco Conti
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 20

Computational models of pragmatic reasoning with flexible generation of meaning and expression alternatives

Pragmatic language use requires reasoning about alternatives: the alternative expressions a speaker might have chosen, or the alternative interpretations a listener might entertain. Formal and computational models of pragmatics must therefore specify the sets of alternatives that interlocutors reason over, which is often done through manual specification.