arXiv Machine Learning By Gyeolhee Lee, Moosun Kim, Taewook Kwon, Jaehun Kim, Dongjin Lee

Toward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces a multifidelity approach for predicting railway-bogie responses, combining low-fidelity multibody simulation data with high-fidelity roller-rig measurements. It employs a time-delay neural network to model simulation trends and a residual-correction network, constrained by a physics-informed dynamic-balance equation, to adjust for discrepancies. The method achieves a coefficient of determination of 0.8197 and low error metrics on a held-out 385 km/h test case.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

A Residual Learning Approach for Unsteady Aerodynamic Load Prediction

The paper explores using residual learning with an LSTM neural network to enhance unsteady aerodynamic load predictions for aeroelastic applications. By training the network on the difference between high‑fidelity CFD lift data and a physics‑based Wagner model for the NLR 7301 airfoil in transonic flow, the residual approach consistently outperforms a direct neural‑network model in most tests, especially in generalization scenarios. The study demonstrates that residual learning can effectively augment classical low‑order aerodynamic theories by learning a lower‑variance correction to the baseline physics model.

By Divya Sanghi, Carlos E. S. Cesnik
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18

A Residual Learning Approach for Unsteady Aerodynamic Load Prediction

The paper explores using residual learning with an LSTM neural network to enhance unsteady aerodynamic load predictions for aeroelastic applications. By training the network on the difference between high‑fidelity CFD lift data and a physics‑based Wagner model, the residual approach outperforms a direct neural‑network model in most cases, especially in generalization tests. The study demonstrates that aligning residual inputs with the baseline physics variables yields lower error and more consistent performance across varied motion scenarios.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 4

RIDE: An Open Dataset and Benchmark for Train Delay Prediction

arXiv:2606. 05070v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Train delay prediction is an important problem for both passengers and railway operators, yet progress in the field remains difficult to assess due to the lack of standardized datasets, prediction targets, and evaluation protocols.

By Cl\'ement Elliker, Mathis Le Bail, Cl\'ement Mantoux, Jesse Read, Sonia Vanier
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Seismic Site Response Prediction from Sparse Observations Using Finite-Element-Pretrained Latent Dynamics

The paper introduces FLARE‑T, a Transfer‑Enabled Forced Latent Autoencoder for Response Equations, which learns low‑dimensional latent dynamics from dense finite‑element simulations and calibrates them with sparse field observations. By mapping simulated sensor responses into a learned coordinate system, FLARE‑T improves multi‑depth acceleration predictions and pseudo‑acceleration spectra, reducing errors across various sensor locations and motion intensities. Evaluation on a layered‑soil centrifuge test and the Lotung field array demonstrates that FLARE‑T achieves comparable accuracy with different source models, indicating less reliance on precise prior calibration.

By Yi Zhu, Su Chen, Xiaojun Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Observation-Aligned Two-Stage Domain Decomposition for Physics-Informed Traffic State Estimation with Sparse Fixed Sensors

The paper introduces Observation‑Aligned Two‑Stage Domain Decomposition Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (TSDD‑PINN) for reconstructing traffic speed fields from sparse fixed sensors. It first trains a global PINN, then uses its residuals to partition the domain and warm‑start child networks, allowing spatial, temporal, or space‑time refinement. Experiments on the I‑24 MOTION dataset show that TSDD‑PINN achieves lower relative L2 error in most configurations and trains faster than the XPINN baseline, with performance depending on sensing density.

By Eunhan Ka, Ludovic Leclercq, Satish V. Ukkusuri