arXiv:2505. 11491v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study investigates why physics-informed machine learning (PIML) can fail in macroscopic traffic flow modeling.
By Yuan-Zheng Lei, Yaobang Gong, Dianwei Chen, Yao Cheng, Xianfeng Terry Yang
arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.
By Nanxi Chen, Chuanjie Cui, Airong Chen, Sifan Wang, Rujin Ma
arXiv:2608. 15373v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inverse physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can reconstruct a field accurately while returning an incorrect physical parameter.
By Yifan Zhang, Qian Tao
arXiv:2601.12971v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can be limited by coordinate representations and conflicting gradients from heterogeneous physical constra...
By Pancheng Niu, Jun Guo, Qiaolin He, Yongming Chen, Yanchao Shi
The paper introduces a linearized Physics-Informed Neural Network (lPINN), a reduced‑order neural basis approach for solving forward and inverse differential equations. In an offline phase, lPINN learns continuous, differentiable neural basis functions from numerical solutions, which are then frozen for new problem instances; the online solution is obtained by minimizing the governing‑equation residual with additional constraints. Experiments on advection‑diffusion, Burgers', and nonlinear pendulum equations show that lPINN achieves lower solution and parameter errors than vanilla PINNs while reducing online inference times by up to three orders of magnitude, and its continuous representation generalizes to finer meshes without retraining.
By Wenhao Chen, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
arXiv:2609.07814v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) struggle on PDEs whose governing physics varies across the domain. We trace this to a structural property of s...
By Hanwen Wang, Paris Perdikaris
arXiv:2607. 14233v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have had a broad research impact in modeling domains governed by partial differential equations (PDE).
By Nilay Anurag, Shital Adhikari, Taniya Kapoor, Nikhil Muralidhar
The paper introduces Shallow Recurrent Decoder (SHRED) networks as a data‑driven method for accurate state estimation in engineering systems, specifically applied to the TRIGA Mark II research reactor. SHRED maps sparse sensor measurements to the full state space, handling noisy data and requiring minimal training time. The study demonstrates SHRED’s performance using both synthetic CFD data and experimental temperature recordings, achieving low reconstruction errors and showcasing its potential for real‑time monitoring and digital twin development.
By Stefano Riva, Carolina Introini, Jos\`e Nathan Kutz, Antonio Cammi
arXiv:2607. 16177v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently emerged as a promising feedback control strategy for nonlinear and complex dynamical systems.
By Matteo Tomasetto, Nicol\`o Botteghi, Gabriele Bruni, Andrea Manzoni
Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data. By incorporating physical constraints into the training objective, PINOs combine the cross-instance generalization of neural operators with the data efficiency of physics-informed learning.
arXiv:2608.29448v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often face ill-conditioned objectives that limit high-accuracy training. Dense quasi-Newton methods improve...
By Guangyuan Wang, Mads Toftrup, Sebastian Loeschcke, Yixuan Wang, Anima Anandkumar
arXiv:2608. 04778v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) incorporate governing equations into neural-network training and can approximate PDE solutions without requiring large observational datasets.
By Xujia Chen, Xinyue Hu, Letian Chen, Yi Liu, Wenhui Fan