← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Leonardo Fernandes Costa, Helder Gomes Costa, Diogo Lima, Brunno Rodrigues

TOPSIS-RAD: Ranking According to Desires

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 07253v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traditional TOPSIS derives its reference points -- the Positive Ideal Solution ($PIS$) and Negative Ideal Solution ($NIS$) -- from the observed alternative set, making rankings susceptible to misalignment with decision-maker (DM) requirements, sensitivity to outlier performances, and rank reversal.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Jun 4

Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark

arXiv:2606. 05104v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge benchmarks for LLMs face three issues: scaling-driven designs that do not operationalize disciplinary representativeness; flat-payment annotation that permits lazy consensus; and unaudited ranking instability under bounded test budgets.

By Sheng Jin, Minghao Liu, Yunze Xiao, Zeqi Zhou, Heli Qi, Yifan Yao, Meishu Song, Kaijing Ma, Xuan Zhang, Sicong Jiang, Yizhe Li, Ningshan Ma, Jie Wei, Ziniu Li, Minglai Yang, Bangya Liu, Yiming Liang, Xiao Fang, Qingcheng Zeng, Jiarui Liu, Rui Yang, Shen Yan, Wenhao Huang, Jiaheng Liu, Zihan Wang, Weihao Xuan, Ge Zhang
llmsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Scores Are Not Decisions: Cost-Aware Stopping for Tool Acquisition in LLM Agents

arXiv:2607. 27083v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As LLM agents increasingly depend on diverse external services such as search engines, databases, and connectors, agent harnesses face a fundamental tool-selection challenge: acquiring too few tools leaves the task under-informed, while too many adds cost, context load, and privacy exposure.

By Yicheng Feng, Yan Zhang, Yan Cheng, Wei Qi
llmsagentsfine-tuningbenchmarkssafety
More like this →