arXiv:2608. 05958v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The paper addresses several ranking-dependent decision support methods.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2607. 10038v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For many years, the pairwise comparison method has been widely used for decision-making involving experts.
arXiv:2604.17805v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Maximum-likelihood pairwise ranking is a com- mon computational mechanism for prioritization, reputation estimation, and comparison-driven de...
arXiv:2606. 17756v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fairness has become a central concern in ranking problems involving individuals or social groups, particularly under the Responsible Artificial Intelligence agenda.
arXiv:2609.16779v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs are increasingly employed in a wide range of decision-making tasks. However, the opacity of their internal reasoning makes it difficult to validat...
arXiv:2609.07785v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An LLM-agent leaderboard invites a familiar inference: an agent ranked above another is the better agent. Public evaluation logs may not support that c...
arXiv:2508. 00129v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Rank Reversal, where the relative order of alternatives changes in ways that violate axioms of rational decision-making, is a well-documented threat to the reliability of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods.