Hugging Face Trending Papers

Timeline-Bench: Evaluating Agents on Realistic Video-Editing Tasks, from Raw Footage to Final Cut

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Timeline-Bench is a benchmark comprising 56 real video‑editing tasks that require AI agents to transform raw production material into finished videos. Each task includes a brief, source assets, a container, and a set of tests that assess format, content, brief compliance, and quality based on 2,582 blind judgments by 43 video editors. In evaluations, the best agent resolved only 15 of the 56 tasks, and most failures were due to quality tests rather than technical errors.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

OmniEdit-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Instruction-based Video Editing

OmniEdit-Bench introduces a comprehensive benchmark for instruction-based video editing (IVE), addressing limitations of existing datasets by covering spatial, temporal, audio, and reference-based editing tasks and distinguishing explicit from implicit instructions. The evaluation framework assesses editing quality across accuracy, preservation, realism, and consistency, using human judgments and vision-language models, and incorporates an accuracy-aware penalty to ensure instruction fidelity. Experiments reveal that current IVE models perform poorly, highlighting the need for improved methods.

By Chenxuan Miao, Yutong Feng, Yi Lu, Yunfeng Yan, Donglian Qi, Shiwei Zhang, Yu Liu, Xi Chen, Hengshuang Zhao
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 27

FilmBench: A Film-Grade Benchmark for Cinematic Video Generation

Progress in video generation keeps narrowing the visual gap between AI-generated and professionally produced footage, yet most benchmarks still draw prompts from web sources or LLM templates and score them with untrained, generic multimodal models. More fundamentally, their evaluation taxonomies remain rudimentary (overall visual quality, coarse text alignment and temporal smoothness) rather than the professional Cinematic Language criteria by which films are actually made and judged, so they assess basic video plausibility rather than film-grade craft.

arXiv AI
Jul 28

FilmBench: A Film-Grade Benchmark for Cinematic Video Generation

arXiv:2607. 24241v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Progress in video generation keeps narrowing the visual gap between AI-generated and professionally produced footage, yet most benchmarks still draw prompts from web sources or LLM templates and score them with untrained, generic multimodal models.

By Shengyi Wang, Niantong Li, Guangzheng Hu, Hong Qi, Fei Ding, Weixu Qiao, Jinlin Wang, Xiaotong Lv, Peng Han, Zimeng Li, Fanshu Ding, Yushu Wang, Han Wu, Jingjing Chen, Chongxiao Wang, Yanhao Wu, Chenglong Huang, Xiaoqian Zhu, Jie Tian, Hua Li, Jingjing Fan, Mingshuang Tang, Zhong Li, Hengxia Qiang, Weibin Chen, Jinyang Zhen, Bing Zhao, Lin Qu, Jing Li, Hu Wei
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Beyond Coherence: Benchmarking Professional Editing-Technique Execution in Multi-Shot Audio-Video Generation

arXiv:2609.08275v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent multi-shot audio-video generators can produce increasingly coherent and cinematic outputs, but coherence does not imply the ability to execute e...

By Tianyi Zeng, Junchao Liao, Yujie Wei, Ziying Zhang, Litao Li, Tianyi Wang, Zhichao Wei, Shuyao Xu, Wenwen Qiang, Siyu Zhu, Zhenghao Zhang, Long Qin