arXiv:2609.25017v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deepfakes, synthetic audiovisual content produced by deep generative models, have escalated into a critical threat across civilian and military domains...
By Alexandros Gazis, Efstathios Karypidis, Kleanthi Santamouri, Theodoros Vavouras, Nikos E. Mastorakis, Stylianos Pappas
arXiv:2606. 00621v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed how content is now produced.
By Shubhashis Sengupta, Benjamin McCarty, Milind Savagaonkar, Rhine Andotra
arXiv:2501. 14728v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models have achieved significant success, their misuse for generating deceptive content raises growing concerns about online information security.
By Zehong Yan, Peng Qi, Wynne Hsu, Mong Li Lee
arXiv:2606. 03348v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent generative models can now produce visual artifacts with realistic embedded text and layouts, creating a new misinformation threat: synthetic credibility.
By Junxiao Yang, Minghao Zhang, Xiaoce Wang, Haoran Liu, Shiyao Cui, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
The paper "Industrialized Deception: The Collateral Effects of LLM-Generated Misinformation on Digital Ecosystems" updates the 2024 survey on generative AI and misinformation, shifting from a literature review to practical countermeasures. It documents changes in the threat landscape, noting that Large Language Models and multimodal systems have improved AI-generated content, thereby worsening information quality. The authors introduce JudgeGPT, a platform for assessing human perception of AI-generated news, and RogueGPT, a controlled stimulus generation engine, forming an experimental pipeline to study detection and mitigation strategies, including LLM-based detection and inoculation approaches.
By Alexander Loth, Martin Kappes, Marc-Oliver Pahl
The paper introduces Provenance Density, an interface that visualizes the density of verified claims within a text to counter the Fluency Trap—where users mistake fluent AI-generated hallucinations for truth. In a study with 81 participants, the interface significantly improved users’ ability to distinguish true from fabricated content, while no signal led to no discernment. A technical audit of 200 samples revealed that retrieval density alone is insufficient, and that the Consistency Veto provides most of the discriminative power for dynamic queries.
By Qing Zhang, Yifei Huang, Juyoung Lee, Thad Starner, Jun Rekimoto