Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to guide urban safety decisions, but this study shows that their judgments are more influenced by neighborhood names than by geographic coordinates. Across seven instruct‑tuned models tested on 186 neighborhoods in Los Angeles and Chicago, name‑based ratings varied significantly and correlated with the proportion of locally dominant marginalized groups, while coordinate‑only ratings remained largely flat. The research finds that removing neighborhood names reduces both bias and accuracy, highlighting the complex role of demographic stereotypes and crime signals in LLM safety assessments.
By Huy Nguyen, Yue Lin
The paper introduces a network‑based spatial context retrieval pipeline that uses pedestrian street networks and open data (OpenStreetMap, GHS‑POP) to generate compact spatial briefs for open‑weight large language models. It then builds a faithfulness benchmark that labels each model claim by its source—whether grounded in the brief or drawn from training knowledge—and tests models against planted false premises across multiple cities and model configurations. The study finds that model family and generation influence resistance to false premises more than model size, revealing dimensions of spatial reasoning not captured by traditional correctness metrics.
By Joan Perez
The study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can predict neighborhood-level human mobility without training data. Using anonymized Cuebiq data across four U.S. metropolitan areas, the authors compare zero‑shot LLM predictions to supervised baselines for various mobility outcomes and assess structural alignment with empirical trends. Results show supervised models outperform LLMs (average accuracy 0.580 vs. 0.435), with LLMs relying on coarse, stable priors that may exhibit biased treatment of protected-group predictors.
By Saad Mohammad Abrar, Eesha Kurella, Arnav Dadarya, Naman Awasthi, Kazi Tasnim Zinat, Vanessa Frias-Martinez
arXiv:2503.00610v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Understanding how people perceive urban environments is essential for inclusive planning, yet conventional surveys are costly and difficult t...
By Ciro Beneduce, Bruno Lepri, Massimiliano Luca
arXiv:2509. 02910v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act on people's behalf: they write emails, buy groceries, and book restaurants.
By Sandra C. Matz, Kimberly Klugescheid, C. Blaine Horton, Sofie Goethals
PlaceSeek is a human‑centered geospatial retrieval framework that maps natural‑language queries to street‑view images by decomposing queries into functional and affective sub‑intents. It uses a Semantic Grounding Module to verify that candidate images contain the physical evidence needed for the intended activity, and an Affective Alignment Module to re‑rank these candidates based on human urban perception judgments. Evaluated on 31,956 Milan street‑view locations, PlaceSeek achieves high precision and ranking metrics, outperforming several vision‑language baselines and demonstrating the importance of both physical grounding and affective alignment for complex urban spatial queries.
By Ziqi Cui, Shangyu Lou