arXiv AI By Dahlia Shehata, Ming Li

The Formalism Trap: Are LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluators Blinded by Consensus Mimicry under Social Load?

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 28641v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce the \textit{Agentic Formalism Trap} and the Evaluative Dissonance Index ($D_E$), quantifying how LLM-as-a-Judge systems conflate structural proceduralism with semantic truth under adversarial load.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 1

QUACK: Questioning, Understanding, and Auditing Communicated Knowledge in Multimodal Social Deduction Agents

arXiv:2605.27068v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Social deduction games have become a popular testbed for probing reasoning, deception, coordination, and belief modeling in Large Language Mo...

By Ye Yuan, Rui Song, Weien Li, Zeyu Li, Haochen Liu, Xiangyu Kong, Changjiang Han, Yonghan Yang, Zichen Zhao, Zixuan Dong, Fuyuan Lyu, Bowei He, Haolun Wu, Jikun Kang, Xue Liu
arXiv AI
Oct 28

Tracing the Cascade: A Topology-Aware Evaluation Framework for Scientific Agent Hallucinations

The paper introduces SCHEMA, a topology‑aware evaluation framework designed to assess hallucinations in large language model agents used for scientific research. SCHEMA builds scientific concept graphs from benchmark seeds and literature evidence, then generates graph‑grounded tasks such as claim verification, multi‑hop reasoning, open‑ended explanation, and experimental code generation. It evaluates agents using a trajectory hallucination pipeline that assigns a topology‑weighted severity score and a multi‑agent counterfactual attribution module that identifies the causal mechanisms behind failures. The study finds that hallucinations tend to cluster around highly connected knowledge hubs and that a model’s final accuracy can be misleading, as correct answers may arise from structurally flawed reasoning. "whyItMatters":"The findings highlight that terminal accuracy alone is insufficient for high‑stakes scientific applications, underscoring the need for mechanism‑level evaluation grounded in knowledge topology."

By Xinshun Feng, Ziqi Miao, Lijun Li, Jing Shao