arXiv AI By Nazl{\i} Nur Karabulut, tanya Braun

The Curious Case of Exploding DecPOMDPs: Containing the Fire through Policy Counting

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces policy‑counted DecPOMDPs, a variant of decentralized partially observable Markov decision processes that mitigates the exponential growth in agent numbers by counting policies instead of agents. By exploiting symmetry among agents, the authors achieve a compact representation that reduces model complexity and evaluation cost to polynomial levels. They further present a dynamic programming algorithm that leverages this compact form to solve policy‑counted DecPOMDPs efficiently.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18

The Curious Case of Exploding DecPOMDPs: Containing the Fire through Policy Counting

The paper addresses the exponential complexity of Decentralised Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (DecPOMDPs) by shifting focus from counting agents to counting policies. By exploiting symmetry among agents, it introduces a compact encoding that reduces model complexity and evaluation cost to polynomial dependence. The authors further develop a policy‑counted dynamic programming algorithm that efficiently solves these policy‑counted DecPOMDPs.

arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago

Policy Iteration Is Not Strongly Polynomial for Deterministic Markov Decision Processes: The Price of Algorithmic Anarchy

The paper presents an exponential lower bound on the number of iterations required by Howard's policy iteration algorithm for deterministic discounted Markov decision processes with at most two actions per state, when the discount factor is part of the input. This result shows that Howard's method cannot be strongly polynomial in this setting and establishes an exponential gap compared to the simplex method with Dantzig's pivoting rule, which remains strongly polynomial. Even with rewards limited to logarithmic bit length, a stretched‑exponential lower bound is achieved, highlighting a fundamental difference between decentralized, simultaneous improvements and Dantzig's coordinated single‑action selection.

By Han Zhong, Yinyu Ye
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18

Adaptive Policy Portfolios for Robust Markov Decision Processes

The paper investigates adaptive policy portfolios for Robust Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs), proposing finite sets of memoryless randomized policies generated offline and selected online. It introduces robust regret as a metric for portfolio quality, comparing each portfolio member’s performance to the optimal policy for each plausible environment. The authors provide complexity-theoretic results showing that certifying and synthesizing such portfolios is highly intractable, and they present an offline construction method that can be specialized at runtime.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

Adaptive Policy Portfolios for Robust Markov Decision Processes

The paper introduces adaptive policy portfolios for robust Markov decision processes, where a finite set of memoryless randomized policies is synthesized offline and paired with an online selector. It defines robust regret as a measure of portfolio quality, comparing each portfolio member to the optimal policy for each plausible environment. The authors provide a complexity-theoretic analysis of portfolio certification and synthesis, showing that even deterministic portfolios in simple settings are highly complex, and present an offline construction method that can be specialized at runtime.

By Kasper Engelen, Sebastian Junges, Guillermo A. P\'{e}rez, Marnix Suilen