arXiv:2608. 05987v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) with verifiable rewards constructs trajectory-level advantage estimates, yet it often fails to credit the few pivotal decisions that determine outcomes in long-horizon, multi-turn agentic tasks.
By Zi-Han Wang, Zhengxi Lu, Zhiyuan Yao, Jinyang Wu, Jie Wu, Zhengzhou Cai, Yueqing Sun, Ziang Ye, Linji Hao, Qi Gu, Xunliang Cai, Yongliang Shen, Yujiu Yang
arXiv:2603. 21563v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Collaborative multi-agent large language models (LLMs) can solve complex reasoning tasks by decomposing roles, but reinforcement learning for such systems is limited by credit assignment: shared terminal rewards obscure individual contributions and can encourage free-riding.
By Zhongyi Li, Wan Tian, Yikun Ban, Jinju Chen, Huiming Zhang, Yang Liu, Fuzhen Zhuang
arXiv:2510. 05592v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Outcome-driven reinforcement learning has advanced reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but prevailing tool-augmented approaches train a single, monolithic policy that interleaves thoughts and tool calls under full context; this scales poorly with long horizons and diverse tools and generalizes weakly to new scenarios.
By Zhuofeng Li, Haoxiang Zhang, Seungju Han, Sheng Liu, Jianwen Xie, Yu Zhang, Yejin Choi, James Zou, Pan Lu
Long-horizon large language model (LLM) agents are typically optimized with sparse terminal outcomes, making fine-grained credit assignment across multi-step interactions difficult. Existing approache...
arXiv:2606. 09348v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon agentic tasks pose a fundamental credit assignment challenge for outcome-base reinforcement learning: trajectory-level rewards verify final correctness but provide limited guidance on which intermediate reasoning steps or tool interactions contribute to the outcome.
By Yang Tian, Rui Wang, Xumeng Wen, Junjie Li, Shizhao Sun, Lei Song, Jiang Bian, Bo Zhao
The paper introduces Reverse‑Turn Policy Optimization (RTPO), a method that restructures multi‑turn agentic reinforcement learning rollouts into sparse reverse trees and updates policies in temporal reverse order. This approach addresses three key instability sources—context mismatch, weak turn‑level credit assignment, and asynchronous policy drift—by aligning each decision with its downstream continuation. Theoretical analysis shows RTPO eliminates context mismatch and drift, reduces credit bias, and converges to recursive optimality, while experiments demonstrate performance gains of 21.50% over trajectory‑level and 10.76% over turn‑level baselines on multi‑turn agentic RL benchmarks.
By Yugu Li, Jimmy Cao, Jianglin Qiao, Siyi Hu