Hugging Face Trending Papers

Synthetic Cultural Agents from Aggregate Anchors

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

The paper proposes a new method for generating synthetic survey responses that uses declared aggregate preference anchors to create group-indexed choice policies, avoiding the mixing of inference-time information with pretraining associations. It introduces a parameter‑efficient adapter trained via Direct Preference Optimization to map GPS coordinates to synthetic responses, and evaluates these adapters on World Values Survey items, showing they recover imposed labels and exhibit strong correlation with GPS trust scores. The study demonstrates that anchored policies can preserve aggregate signals while not necessarily mirroring human response patterns, offering an inspectable construction and evaluation framework that separates anchor transfer from human criterion agreement.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
6d ago

Prompts to Proxies: Emulating Human Preferences via a Compact LLM Ensemble

The paper introduces Prompts to Proxies (P2P), a two‑stage inference‑time system that uses structured attribute‑based prompting and entropy‑guided sampling to build a diverse proxy pool, followed by L1‑regularized regression to create a compact weighted ensemble that matches aggregate survey responses. P2P achieves low mean squared error on American Trends Panel data and competitive performance on World Values Survey cross‑locale experiments, outperforming baseline prompting and demographic‑conditioning methods while using minimal training data. The authors argue that this preference reconstruction approach offers a lightweight, externally verifiable alternative for aligning large language model proxies with target human populations.

By Bingchen Wang, Zi-Yu Khoo, Jingtan Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 23

Investigating Multi-Cultural Value Selection Biases in LLMs

The study examines how large language models (LLMs) respond to simultaneous cultural identity cues, comparing explicit country names with implicit language cues. Using World Values Survey probing and open‑ended sociopolitical generation, it finds that language cues shift responses more than explicit cues but not toward the named country’s distribution, while explicit cues produce more differentiated value changes. Across 1.6 million responses, naming a country narrows the gap to the model’s own country‑specific answers by 30–44%.

By Siddhesh Pawar, Arnav Arora, Dustin Wright, Dirk Hovy, Isabelle Augenstein
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9

PLURAL: A Global Dataset for Value Alignment

Large language models (LLMs) are used worldwide, yet disproportionately reflect Western values, limiting their ability to represent diverse value systems. We introduce PLURAL, a large-scale, value-focused preference dataset grounded in the Integrated Values Survey (IVS), a nationally representative survey spanning 92 countries.