arXiv Machine Learning By Giorgia Rigamonti, Mirko Paolo Barbato, Davide Marelli, Paolo Napoletano

Subject-Conditioned Glucose Forecasting in Type-1 Diabetes

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 19006v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate forecasting of blood glucose concentration is key in the management of Type 1 Diabetes, facilitating early detection of adverse glycemic events and supporting timely therapeutic interventions.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 8

GlucoFM-Bench: Benchmarking Time-Series Foundation Models for Blood Glucose Forecasting

arXiv:2606. 06881v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Blood glucose forecasting models are foundational for modern diabetes management systems, as reliable short-term predictions can enable proactive interventions, support automated insulin delivery, and reduce the risk of hypo- and hyperglycemic events.

By Baiying Lu, Zhaohui Liang, Ryan Pontius, Shengpu Tang, Temiloluwa Prioleau
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

Evidence-Guided Neural Architecture Selection under Uncertainty for Subject-Specific Blood Glucose Forecasting

arXiv:2606. 05373v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable neural architecture selection is an open challenge in time-series forecasting under limited, noisy, and heterogeneous data, where standard heuristic architecture design and validation approaches fail to ensure accurate and reliable prediction and generalization.

By Md Azharul Islam, Dwyer Deighan, Tarunraj Singha, Danial Faghihi
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 8

It's All in the Way You Say It: The Role of Information Representation in LLM-Based Glycemic-Event Prediction

The paper examines how the representation of physiological data affects the performance of large language models (LLMs) in predicting post‑meal blood glucose events for people with type 1 diabetes. Using the OhioT1DM dataset, the authors compare zero‑shot and few‑shot prompt‑based LLMs across 30, 60, and 90‑minute horizons, varying the textual encoding of glucose readings, derived descriptors, and contextual variables such as insulin, meals, carbs, and activity. Results show that while conventional supervised models excel at hyperglycemia prediction, certain prompt‑based LLM configurations outperform them for hypoglycemia, and that the way data is presented to the model is a key determinant of success, with added context not consistently improving outcomes.