arXiv Computation and Language By Daniela Occhipinti, Malvina Nissim, Marco Guerini

Stranger, Fan, or Peer? A Systematic Study on the Role of Interlocutor in Persona-Based Dialogue Generation

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The study investigates how the visibility of speaker biographies to interlocutors during training, inference, and evaluation affects persona-based dialogue generation. It finds that training-time visibility is the primary factor determining whether models express persona traits or simply copy biographical text, and that providing interlocutor-biography visibility during training reduces target-biography copying. Additionally, asymmetric disclosure—where only the interlocutor sees the target biography—leads to more frequent leakage of target content into interlocutor turns, making such dialogues easier for a judge to identify.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

The Situated Identity Test: Distinguishing Persistent Cognitive Identity from Persona Imitation

The paper introduces the Situated Identity Test (SIT), a framework that assesses whether a language model’s behavior can be traced to a specific developmental lineage rather than merely imitating a persona. SIT requires agents to possess accurate knowledge of their recorded experiences while appropriately ignoring ungrounded information, and it demonstrates that policies based only on compressed profiles are limited in distinguishing between colliding life histories. The authors present SITBench, an evaluation suite with 25 profile‑collision pairs and 10,000 probes across nine model architectures, and provide open‑source tools and pilot results on state‑of‑the‑art foundation models.

By Jun He, Deying Yu
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Do LLMs Understand Personality? Rethinking Persona Fidelity Evaluation through Structured Behavioral Inference

The paper introduces PRISM, a new framework for evaluating how well large language models (LLMs) maintain persona fidelity in dynamic dialogue. PRISM reframes the task as a structured inverse inference problem grounded in Systemic Functional Linguistics, breaking persona fidelity into Task Framing, Interpersonal Stance, and Linguistic Style dimensions. Experiments demonstrate that PRISM produces more accurate and stable judgments than existing holistic or static psychometric methods, offering a more reliable and auditable evaluation process.

By Mengfan Li, Zesheng Wei, Xuanhua Shi, Yang Deng