← Back to all news
arXiv Computer Vision By Andrea DeMarco, Ian Fenech Conti, Hayley Camilleri, Ardiana Bushi, Simone Riggi

STRADAViT: Self-Supervised Domain Adaptation of Vision Transformer Backbones for Radio Astronomy

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

STRADAViT is a self‑supervised continued‑pretraining framework that adapts Vision Transformer (ViT) backbones for radio‑astronomy image analysis. It curates mixed‑survey data, generates radio‑astronomy‑aware training views, and initializes encoders with ViT‑MAE, optionally adding register tokens. Evaluations on three morphology benchmarks (MiraBest, LoTSS DR2, and Radio Galaxy Zoo) show that a register‑based two‑stage checkpoint improves linear‑probe Macro‑F1 scores over the ViT‑MAE baseline and enhances fine‑tuning on MiraBest and RGZ DR1, though performance on LoTSS DR2 fine‑tuning declines; these differences are statistically significant.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

Related stories

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Cross-simulator transfer with foundation model summaries: Towards robust SKA-era reionization inference

The paper demonstrates that a self‑supervised Vision Transformer (ViT) pretrained on a fast, low‑cost semi‑numerical simulator can produce data summaries that transfer across different simulators without retraining. In 21cm cosmology, the ViT—named SKATR—pretrained on 67,000 21cmFAST lightcones is applied unchanged to hydrodynamical Loreli II lightcones, enabling accurate inference of five astrophysical parameters with fewer radiative‑transfer simulations than a fully‑supervised baseline. SKATR remains accurate, informative, and calibrated even under realistic SKA antenna array noise, outperforming supervised models retrained on noisy data.

By Yannic Pietschke, Caroline Heneka, Ayodele Ore, Romain Meriot
llmsragdiffusioncomputer-vision
More like this →
arXiv AI
Aug 26

A survey detection channel overrides the pixels in an astronomical foundation model, and biases tomographic mean redshifts

The study audits the AION-1 foundation model, a 39‑modality transformer trained on over 200 million astronomical objects, and finds that its reliance on a survey detection channel—specifically the segmentation map—introduces a severe systematic bias. By keeping image tokens unchanged and editing only the segmentation map, all model outputs (flux, size, ellipticity, redshift) shift by factors of 110–4400 compared to a placebo, revealing that the model’s predictions are driven more by detection gating than by the actual light distribution. This bias propagates into cosmological analyses, shifting tomographic mean redshifts by a median 0.71 × the LSST DESC requirement and exceeding it in multiple assignments, while removing the detection channel eliminates the effect without measurable cost. whyItMatters":"The bias in the detection channel directly inflates errors in key astronomical measurements, potentially compromising the precision of cosmological studies that rely on accurate redshift estimates."

By Ihor Kendiukhov
llmscomputer-vision
More like this →
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 24

nnFoundation: 3D Foundation Models for Radiology

nnFoundation introduces complementary convolutional and transformer-based 3D foundation models for radiology, trained on 2.1 million CT, MRI, and PET volumes from 125 datasets. The models are evaluated on 108 tasks—including segmentation, detection, classification, report generation, and image retrieval—under domain shift, low-data, and low-compute scenarios, consistently outperforming prior 3D foundation models and training from scratch. Performance varies by task type, with convolutional models excelling at spatially localized tasks and transformer models at global semantic reasoning, and dynamic alignment with dataset characteristics further enhances transferability.

By Constantin Ulrich Harsy, Tassilo Wald, Karol Gotkowski, Yannick Kirchhoff, Marcel Knopp, Maximilian Rokuss, Elisa Stegmeier, Philipp Schader, Dasha Trofimova, Raphael Stock, Kim-Celine Kahl, Stephen Schaumann, Selen Erkan, David Zimmerer, Stefan Denner, Moritz Langenberg, Sebastian Ziegler, Katharina Eckstein, Maximilian Fischer, Jonathan Suprijadi, B\'alint Kov\'acs, Benjamin Hamm, Anand Deshpande, Dimitrios Bounias, Nico Disch, Shuhan Xiao, Jessica K\"achele, Jan Sellner, Rajesh Baidya, Jeremias Traub, Lars Kr\"amer, Maximilian Zenk, Tim R\"adsch, Stefan Dvoretskii, Robin Peretzke, Jonathan Deissler, Alexandra Ertl, Partha Ghosh, Kris Dreher, Stefan Dinkelacker, Annika Reinke, Evangelia Christodoulou, Numan Saeed, Yoland Savriama, Santiago Estrada, David K\"ugler, Laura Alexandra Daza Barragan, Cristina Isabel Gonzalez Osorio, Jan Peeken, Michael Baumgartner, Marvin Teichmann, Guillaume Chabin, Matthias Kirchler, Valentin Koch, for the ALFA study, Markus Hohenhaus, Dimitri Koslov, Nina Decker, Mohammad Yaqub, Arnd Heuser, Martin Reuter, Julia A. Schnabel, Tobias Heimann, Florin Ghesu, Paul Brachmann, Claus P. Heu{\ss}el, Alexander Radbruch, Gianluca Brugnara, Aditya Rastogi, Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Ignaz Reicht, Julius C. Holzschuh, Michael Bach, Bram Stieltjes, Kai Schlamp, Lena Maier-Hein, Marco Nolden, Ralf Floca, Paul F. J\"ager, Philipp Vollmuth, Fabian Isensee, Klaus H. Maier-Hein
llmscomputer-visionbenchmarks
More like this →