arXiv:2509. 04194v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce a bandit framework for stochastic matching under the multinomial logit (MNL) choice model.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
We study the contextual combinatorial semi-bandit (CCSB) problem with general reward function approximation. At each round, the learner observes a context, selects a combinatorial action consisting of a subset of basic arms, and receives the reward of each selected arm; the goal is to maximize the cumulative reward over time.
arXiv:2607. 13686v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the contextual combinatorial semi-bandit (CCSB) problem with general reward function approximation.
The paper introduces Persistent Candidate LinUCB (PC‑LinUCB), a variant of the LinUCB algorithm for linear bandits that reduces per‑round score evaluations from ≥×K to ≥×(k+q) by maintaining a small set of active actions and sampling challengers from the remaining actions. It provides high‑probability regret bounds that include a standard learning term and an additive discovery cost of order ≥×((K-k)×log(K-k))/q, which does not grow with the horizon. Experiments demonstrate that PC‑LinUCB accelerates LinUCB while keeping regret comparable, and the persistent candidate approach can be applied beyond LinUCB.
arXiv:2606. 29221v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We address the problem of online multi-human multi-robot teaming through the lens of a linear matching bandit framework, where a learner assigns robots with unknown features from a fixed pool to distinct sets of human agents over multiple rounds.
arXiv:2606. 19883v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study a multi-agent multi-armed bandit problem in the competitive setup with two-sided matching markets under a human centric decision making model.
arXiv:2608. 12231v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study adversarial combinatorial bandits with $m$-set actions, where at each round the learner selects $m$ out of $d$ items and observes only the aggregate loss of the selected items.