arXiv Machine Learning June 5, 2026 By Abhishek Divekar

Statistically Reliable LLM-Based Ranking Evaluation via Prediction-Powered Inference

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 05308v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With PRECISE, we extended Prediction-Powered Inference to produce bias-corrected estimates of ranking evaluation metrics by combining a small human-labeled set with a large LLM-judged set.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 31

(Towards) Scalable Reliable Automated Evaluation with Large Language Models

arXiv:2607. 28282v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluating the quality and relevance of textual outputs from Large Language Models (LLMs) remains challenging and resource-intensive.

By Bertil Braun, Martin Forell

llms benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 15

From Uncertain Judgments to Calibrated Rankings: Conformal Elo Estimation for LLM Evaluation

arXiv:2606. 13221v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluating new large language models typically requires costly human annotation campaigns at scale.

By Bora Kargi, David Salinas

llms safety

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 5

A Judge-Aware Ranking Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models without Ground Truth

arXiv:2601. 21817v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) on open-ended tasks without ground-truth labels is increasingly done via the LLM-as-a-judge paradigm.

By Mingyuan Xu, Xinzi Tan, Jiawei Wu, Doudou Zhou

llms benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 9

Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement

arXiv:2605. 15416v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Jung et al.

By Gaojie Jin, Yong Tao, Lijia Yu, Tianjin Huang

llms

arXiv AI

Jun 16

Metric Match: A Subset Selection Approach to Evaluating LLM Judge Reliability

arXiv:2606. 15029v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM judges are used to reduce the need for costly human labor in evaluating open-ended text generation.

By Alyssa Unell, Natalie Dullerud, Naomi Boneh, Meena Jagadeesan, Tatsu Hashimoto, Nigam Shah, Sanmi Koyejo

llms safety

arXiv Machine Learning

1d ago

Limits to scalable evaluation at the frontier: LLM as Judge won't beat twice the data

arXiv:2410. 13341v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: High quality annotations are increasingly a bottleneck in the explosively growing machine learning ecosystem.

By Florian E. Dorner, Vivian Y. Nastl, Moritz Hardt

llms

Related stories

(Towards) Scalable Reliable Automated Evaluation with Large Language Models

From Uncertain Judgments to Calibrated Rankings: Conformal Elo Estimation for LLM Evaluation

A Judge-Aware Ranking Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models without Ground Truth

Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement

Metric Match: A Subset Selection Approach to Evaluating LLM Judge Reliability

Limits to scalable evaluation at the frontier: LLM as Judge won't beat twice the data