arXiv:2609.36608v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) trains multi-turn language agents with dense teacher supervision on student-generated responses. However, standard think-t...
By Zubin Zheng, Jiahao Wu, Shaofeng Zhang, Zhirui Zhang, Yew-Soon Ong, Shengcai Liu
The paper introduces STI-OPD, a stochastic teacher intervention framework that improves on-policy distillation for multi-turn agentic tasks. By measuring teacher‑student policy discrepancy with KL divergence, STI-OPD probabilistically replaces student actions with teacher actions to provide reliable supervision. An Importance‑Weighted Reverse KL objective then corrects token sampling mismatches, enabling the student to learn from mixed‑policy trajectories and outperform prior OPD baselines across benchmarks.
By Junnan Liu, Linhao Luo, Zhijun Chen, Qianren Mao, Thuy-Trang Vu, Gholamreza Haffari
arXiv:2609.36546v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student model on its self-generated trajectories with dense token-level teacher feedback. However, naive OPD ma...
By Shutong Wu, Xiwen Chen, Brendan Rappazzo, Daiheng Zhang, Anderson Schneider, Yuriy Nevmyvaka, Jiawei Zhang
arXiv:2606. 15912v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-turn agents that plan, invoke tools, and interact with environments offer a promising paradigm for solving complex tasks, yet their capabilities typically rely on very large models whose inference cost is prohibitive in practice.
By Gengsheng Li, Mao Zheng, Mingyang Song, Ruiqi Liu, Tianyu Yang, Jie Sun, Qiyong Zhong, Haiyun Guo, Junfeng Fang, Dan Zhang, Jinqiao Wang
arXiv:2609. 40285v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) is a promising approach for training language agents, providing dense teacher supervision on student-generated trajectories.
By Yinghui He, Yapei Chang, Khushi Bhardwaj, Daniele Molinari, Tugrul Konuk, Jan Kautz, Ali Hatamizadeh
Contrastive On-Policy Distillation (COPD) is a framework that improves on-policy distillation by using a frozen teacher to evaluate student states under two contrasting prompts—one encouraging low reasoning effort and one encouraging high effort. The difference in log‑probabilities between these prompts provides a token‑level advantage signal that guides the student toward more concise and efficient reasoning strategies. Experiments on nine multimodal benchmarks show that COPD reduces reasoning length while maintaining task performance, and the contrastive approach can also be applied to on‑policy self‑distillation, allowing a model to compress its own reasoning without an external teacher.
By Jiacheng Ruan, Jun Tang, Wenzhen Yuan, Ting Liu, Shuai Bai, Dayiheng Liu, Zhibo Yang, Yuzhuo Fu