arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1

SMOTE-VAR: An Uncertainty-Aware Oversampling Method for Predicting Depression Remission in University Students

The paper introduces SMOTE‑VAR, an uncertainty‑aware oversampling technique that uses a Gaussian process variance function to filter out invalid synthetic minority samples. Applied to a university student depression dataset, SMOTE‑VAR outperforms existing oversampling methods in predicting remission outcomes. By more accurately identifying students unlikely to remit, the method supports earlier, personalized interventions.

By Dang Nguyen, Arun Kumar A V, Taylor A. Braund, Wu Yi Zheng, Debopriyo Bal, Leonard Hoon, Jill Newby, Helen Christensen, Svetha Venkatesh, Alexis Whitton, Sunil Gupta
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Predicting Symptoms of Amotivation and Anhedonia among University Students with a Novel Oversampling Method

The paper introduces a new oversampling technique that uses a predictive model to generate nominal variables instead of interpolating them, addressing a key limitation of SMOTE. Applied to a large GPS‑location dataset of university students, the method outperforms existing oversampling approaches in predicting high levels of amotivation and anhedonia. This improvement could help identify students with these debilitating symptoms earlier and more accurately.

By Dang Nguyen, Bao Duong, Arun Kumar, Dat Phan-Trong, Julian Berk, Taylor Braund, Kien Do, Debopriyo Bal, Wu Yi Zheng, Leonard Hoon, Jill Newby, Helen Christensen, Svetha Venkatesh, Alexis Whitton, Sunil Gupta
arXiv AI
Jul 21

Data Balancing Strategies: A Systematic Survey of Resampling and Augmentation Methods

arXiv:2505. 13518v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Imbalanced datasets, where one class significantly outnumbers others, remain a persistent challenge in machine learning, often biasing predictions toward the majority class and degrading classifier performance.

By Behnam Yousefimehr, Mehdi Ghatee, Javad Fazli, Shervin Ghaffari, Zahra Rafei, Mohammad Amin Seifi, Sajed Tavakoli, Abolfazl Nikahd, Mahdi Razi Gandomani, Alireza Orouji, Ramtin Mahmoudi Kashani, Sarina Heshmati, Negin Sadat Mousavi
arXiv AI
Oct 28

When uncertainty quantification fails: structural vulnerabilities and corrections for selective prediction under clinical class imbalance

The paper investigates how uncertainty quantification fails in selective prediction systems when clinical data exhibit severe class imbalance, leading to systematic exclusion of minority patients. Through experiments on 56 synthetic scenarios and three neurodegenerative disease cohorts, the authors show that standard uncertainty measures become proxies for class membership rather than true ambiguity, and that combining class‑aware correction (CCR) with threshold‑aware metrics restores proper monotonicity and protects minority patients. The study proposes adopting threshold‑aligned uncertainty measures and class‑stratified evaluation to mitigate this bias and improve safety in clinical AI pipelines.

By Walter Endrizzi, Flavio Ragni, Raffaele Marchesi, Stefano Bovo, Monica Moroni, Giuseppe Jurman, Venet Osmani