arXiv AI
Small Updates, Big Doubts: Does Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning Enhance Hallucination Detection ?
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 9
BEACON: Behavioral Entropy Aggregation for Cross-Model Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models
arXiv:2606. 07528v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination in large language models (LLMs), defined as the generation of factually incorrect or unsupported content, remains a critical barrier to reliable deployment.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14
Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models Using Diversion Decoding
arXiv:2607. 10476v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for retrieving knowledge through seamless, human-like interactions.
arXiv AI
Jun 29
From Signals to Transfer: A Factorised Study of Probe-Based Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Models
arXiv:2606. 27679v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Probe-based uncertainty estimation (UE) has emerged as a prominent approach to detect hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by learning uncertainty from internal model signals.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
HalluTracer: Hallucination Detection via Depth-Averaging Truth Signals
arXiv:2608. 16353v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Even well-aligned large language models confidently generate factually incorrect text, making hallucination a persistent reliability risk in high-stakes deployments.
arXiv AI
Jul 1
Verify when Uncertain: Beyond Self-Consistency in Black Box Hallucination Detection
arXiv:2502. 15845v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often hallucinate, limiting their reliability in sensitive applications.
arXiv AI
Jun 3
Building Reliable Long-Form Generation via Hallucination Rejection Sampling
arXiv:2606. 03628v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in open-ended text generation, yet they remain prone to hallucinating incorrect or unsupported content, which undermines their reliability.