arXiv:2602.11166v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods are widely used to adapt large language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks and are often assume...
By Xu Hu, Yifan Zhang, Songtao Wei, Chen Zhao, Qiannan Li, Bingzhe Li, Feng Chen
arXiv:2602. 02888v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Hallucinations remain a major obstacle for large language models (LLMs), especially in safety-critical domains.
By Ahmad Shapiro, Karan Taneja, Ashok Goel
The paper proposes a hidden‑state probing method for detecting hallucinations at the span level in large language model outputs, moving beyond token‑wise binary classification. By examining layer‑wise activation patterns, the approach identifies the exact onset and continuation tokens of hallucinations, achieving higher precision‑recall AUC than random baselines despite class imbalance. Additionally, the authors introduce a cross‑model detection framework where one model observes another’s internal representations, showing that an external observer can match or surpass the generator’s own self‑detection of hallucination onsets, even when the observer is smaller.
By Kingshuk Gupta, Davide Buscaldi
arXiv:2608. 16353v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Even well-aligned large language models confidently generate factually incorrect text, making hallucination a persistent reliability risk in high-stakes deployments.
By Zhihao Guo, Zonghan Wu, Huan Huo, DaYong Ye, Junwei Zhang, Weiran Yao, Zhiwei Liu, Qingsong Wen, Yilei Shao
arXiv:2607. 10476v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for retrieving knowledge through seamless, human-like interactions.
By Basel Abdeen, S M Tahmid Siddiqui, Meah Tahmeed Ahmed, Anoop Singhal, Latifur Khan, Punya Parag Modi, Ehab Al-Shaer
The paper introduces a token‑level hallucination detector that treats hallucinations as temporally extended spans and uses sequence labeling. It fuses 33‑dimensional features from text statistics, NLI entailment, and language‑model surprisal, and applies a BiGRU to achieve an AUC of 0.840 on RAGTruth, outperforming a logistic‑regression baseline by 11 points. The study shows that temporal ordering of features, rather than model capacity, drives most of the performance gain, and the detector remains effective on unseen language models with less than 4% AUC loss.
By Igor Itkin