arXiv:2605. 03723v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rise of large language models (LLMs) has created an urgent need to distinguish between human-written and LLM-generated text to ensure authenticity and societal trust.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2509. 21160v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the growing use of large language models, concerns over content authenticity have spurred a variety of watermarking schemes.
arXiv:2607. 21458v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rise of human-AI collaborative writing has created a growing need for fine-grained detection methods that support localizing likely LLM-generated content in mixed-authorship documents.
The rise of human-AI collaborative writing has created a growing need for fine-grained detection methods that support localizing likely LLM-generated content in mixed-authorship documents. Existing methods for detecting LLM-generated text mainly focus on document-level classification and cannot identify which parts of the text are generated by LLMs.
arXiv:2606. 06481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI writing assistants become increasingly integrated into real-world drafting and revision workflows, many documents are no longer purely human-written or AI-generated, but instead result from progressive human-AI co-editing.
Large language models (LLMs) are trained on massive and largely undisclosed corpora that may contain copyrighted or privacy-sensitive content. Data contamination detection (DCD) therefore aims to determine whether a given text is a member of the pre-training corpus of a target LLM.
arXiv:2607. 03680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent AI-generated text detection work often introduces a new benchmark together with a specialized detector tailored to it.