The paper introduces a test‑time adaptation (TTA) method for AI text detection that addresses continual distribution shifts such as adversarial humanization, new large language models, and temporal drift in human writing. By exploiting inference‑time homogeneity among unlabeled samples, the TTA approach achieves robust performance, outperforming state‑of‑the‑art supervised detectors—e.g., improving detection of adversarial AI‑generated text from 27.0% to 93.3%. The study demonstrates that TTA can maintain high detection accuracy in real‑world, evolving deployment scenarios.
arXiv:2607. 03680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent AI-generated text detection work often introduces a new benchmark together with a specialized detector tailored to it.
arXiv:2606. 06481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI writing assistants become increasingly integrated into real-world drafting and revision workflows, many documents are no longer purely human-written or AI-generated, but instead result from progressive human-AI co-editing.
Distinguishing machine-generated text (MGT) from human-written text (HWT) becomes increasingly important due to potential misuse. However, most supervised detectors often degrade out-of-domain (OOD) a...
arXiv:2605.12890v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has made machine-generated text increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-writte...
The paper introduces MOSAIC, a large adversarial benchmark for detecting AI-generated text, and presents NeuroStat, a new framework that combines token‑level probabilistic logits with deep semantic hidden states from a single language model. NeuroStat fuses these signals via Macro‑State Residual Modulation and uses orthogonal and contrastive losses to learn complementary representations. Experiments show that NeuroStat outperforms existing methods on MOSAIC, achieving superior robustness against adversarial attacks.
arXiv:2610.17399v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continuous monitoring of generative AI systems requires detecting distribution shifts in the unstructured data they ingest and generate. Existing mon...
arXiv:2606. 00016v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Detecting AI-generated text is becoming increasingly challenging as modern language models approach human-level fluency and can evade detectors that rely on surface statistics or likelihood-based signals.
arXiv:2607. 05908v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world data distributions evolve over time, inducing temporal distribution shift that can substantially degrade the reliability of deployed machine learning systems.
arXiv:2610.19892v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models suffer significant accuracy drops under common corruptions. While test-time adaptation (TTA) successfully mitigates these shifts...
arXiv:2606. 10099v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about misuse such as plagiarism, misinformation, and automated influence operations, motivating the need for robust detectors.
arXiv:2604. 25860v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine-generated text (MGT) detection requires identifying structurally invariant signals across generation models, rather than relying on model-specific fingerprints.
arXiv:2606. 14299v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) such as CLIP have become a standard backbone for open-vocabulary recognition, yet their zero-shot predictions remain vulnerable to distribution shifts encountered at deployment.