arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

MIXAR: Scaling Autoregressive Pixel-based Language Models to Multiple Languages and Scripts

MIXAR is the first generative multilingual pixel‑based language model, pretrained on eight high‑resource languages across Latin and CJK scripts with up to 0.5 B parameters. It replaces unstable adversarial training with a GRPO‑based reinforcement‑learning stage, improving free‑generation accuracy by up to 2.3× on multilingual benchmarks. MIXAR generalizes better to unseen low‑resource languages than a tokenizer‑based model trained on the same corpus, matches tokenizer models on discriminative tasks, and resists orthographic attacks more gracefully.

By Chen Hu, Yintao Tai, Antonio Vergari, Frank Keller, Alessandro Suglia
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 31

What Can Low Resource Languages Learn From Each Other?

The paper examines OCR adaptation for low‑resource languages, noting that fine‑tuning often hits a performance ceiling in data‑scarce settings. It identifies that lower layers of language‑specific models learn redundant features while higher layers capture script nuances, leading to a structural inefficiency. To address this, the authors propose PSMC, a framework that pre‑trains a base model, specializes it per language, merges the experts via task arithmetic, and co‑trains a unified multilingual backbone, achieving about a 2% improvement in Word Recognition Rate across 10 Indian scripts without adding parameters.

By Achyuth P, Kahaan Shah, Chetan Arora
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Not Truly Multilingual: Script Consistency as a Missing Dimension in VLM Evaluation

The paper introduces PuMVR, a benchmark of 1,000 Punjabi image‑text pairs spanning three scripts—Gurmukhi, Shahmukhi, and Roman—to evaluate Vision‑Language Models (VLMs). Testing ten state‑of‑the‑art VLMs reveals a significant Script Gap: models perform well in one script but poorly in another, with accuracy differences up to 16%. The authors propose the Script Consistency Rate (SCR) as a new metric, noting it can be as low as 24.8% on their benchmark, and argue that current multilingual VLMs are not truly multi‑script.

By Prabhjot Singh, Bhushan Pawar, Madhu Reddiboina, Rajvee Sheth