Hugging Face Trending Papers

SecureDrive-FL: Joint Differential Privacy and Gradient-Aware Selective Homomorphic Encryption for Federated Driver Monitoring

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

SecureDrive‑FL combines differential privacy (DP‑SGD) with a novel Gradient‑Aware Selective Homomorphic Encryption (GASHE) scheme to protect federated driver‑monitoring models. GASHE encrypts only gradient components that exceed a DP‑calibrated sensitivity threshold, avoiding full‑parameter encryption. In experiments on a ten‑class distracted driver task, SecureDrive‑FL matches DP‑SGD’s poisoning resistance while also defending against Man‑in‑the‑Middle attacks, adding only 8–10% runtime overhead.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

SecureDrive-FL: Joint Differential Privacy and Gradient-Aware Selective Homomorphic Encryption for Federated Driver Monitoring

The paper introduces GASHE, a gradient‑aware selective homomorphic encryption scheme that encrypts only those gradient components exceeding a differential‑privacy‑calibrated sensitivity threshold, rather than encrypting all parameters. Building on GASHE, SecureDrive‑FL combines DP‑SGD with this selective encryption to form a closed‑loop DP+HE privacy pipeline for federated driver monitoring. Experiments on a ten‑class distracted driver classification task show that SecureDrive‑FL retains the poisoning resistance of DP‑SGD while also defending against Man‑in‑the‑Middle interception, with only an 8–10% runtime overhead.

By Baran Can G\"ul, Hanuma Siddhartha Tunuguntla, Anjana Arvind Naik, Abhishek Vijay Potekar, Nasser Jazdi, Michael Weyrich
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning: Gradient-Based Client Identity Inference and Defenses for Inertial Sensing in Vehicular Edge Networks

The paper investigates how federated learning (FL) updates in vehicular edge networks can reveal client identities through gradient-based attacks on inertial sensor data, using the UCI Human Activity Recognition benchmark as a proxy. Experiments show that an honest-but-curious server can identify clients with near-perfect accuracy from unprotected updates. The authors evaluate lightweight defenses—clipping followed by Gaussian noise and ensemble FL—to mitigate this privacy risk while preserving model utility, reporting differential‑privacy budgets and empirical results across multiple attack classifiers and data partitions.

By Ali Akarma (Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia), Toqeer Ali Syed (Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia), Muhammad Khan (University of the West of England, Bristol, U.K), Qurat-ul-ain Mastoi (University of the West of England, Bristol, U.K), Adeel Ahmad (Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia)
arXiv AI
Aug 18

Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Federated Learning via Explainable Adaptive Differential Privacy

arXiv:2509. 10691v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Decentralized federated learning enables collaborative model training without a central server, but shared model updates can still leak sensitive information through inversion, reconstruction, and membership inference attacks.

By Fardin Jalil Piran, Zhiling Chen, Yang Zhang, Qianyu Zhou, Jiong Tang, Farhad Imani