The paper investigates privacy and integrity risks in federated fine‑tuning of a pretrained MobileNetV4 model on Quick, Draw! data. It shows that a single client update can reveal private labels, that label‑count recovery degrades with more clients, and that backdoor and label‑flipping attacks can succeed under FedAvg but are mitigated by FLTrust. The study also demonstrates a live poisoning session using Indigma’s FedMaestro orchestrator.
By Vasileios Perifanis, Nikolaos Pavlidis
SecureDrive‑FL combines differential privacy (DP‑SGD) with a novel Gradient‑Aware Selective Homomorphic Encryption (GASHE) scheme to protect federated driver‑monitoring models. GASHE encrypts only gradient components that exceed a DP‑calibrated sensitivity threshold, avoiding full‑parameter encryption. In experiments on a ten‑class distracted driver task, SecureDrive‑FL matches DP‑SGD’s poisoning resistance while also defending against Man‑in‑the‑Middle attacks, adding only 8–10% runtime overhead.
The paper introduces GASHE, a gradient‑aware selective homomorphic encryption scheme that encrypts only those gradient components exceeding a differential‑privacy‑calibrated sensitivity threshold, rather than encrypting all parameters. Building on GASHE, SecureDrive‑FL combines DP‑SGD with this selective encryption to form a closed‑loop DP+HE privacy pipeline for federated driver monitoring. Experiments on a ten‑class distracted driver classification task show that SecureDrive‑FL retains the poisoning resistance of DP‑SGD while also defending against Man‑in‑the‑Middle interception, with only an 8–10% runtime overhead.
By Baran Can G\"ul, Hanuma Siddhartha Tunuguntla, Anjana Arvind Naik, Abhishek Vijay Potekar, Nasser Jazdi, Michael Weyrich
arXiv:2601. 14033v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine learning models are increasingly served behind APIs.
By Xiaochen Zhu, Mayuri Sridhar, Srinivas Devadas
arXiv:2412. 12640v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The increasing demand for data privacy, alongside the benefits of aggregating data from networked devices, has catalyzed the emergence of federated learning (FL).
By Rui Zhang, Ka-Ho Chow
arXiv:2510. 04902v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Tuning hyperparameters in federated machine learning can substantially impact model performance.
By Johannes Liebenow, Thorsten Peinemann, Esfandiar Mohammadi
The paper introduces DP‑BR‑FedAvg, a federated learning framework that combines Gaussian‑mechanism differential privacy with a coordinate‑wise trimmed‑mean Byzantine‑robust aggregation rule. It is evaluated on a simulated cross‑institutional classification task involving fraud and clinical‑risk scoring, where it improves the F1‑score for a minority class from 0.030 (plain FedAvg) to 0.119 while bounding privacy loss. The study demonstrates that privacy and robustness mechanisms interact, and that system design for regulated, adversarial, cross‑institutional settings must account for this interaction.
By Srikumar Nayak
arXiv:2607. 06612v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models while retaining data locality, thereby enhancing user privacy.
By Harsh Kasyap, Anil Kumar Pradhan, Ugur Ilker Atmaca, Graham Cormode, Carsten Maple
arXiv:2609.37011v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Federated learning enables multiple clients to collaboratively train models without sharing their private data. However, the lack of visibility into...
By Hongxu Su, Jianzhu Yao, Xuechao Wang, Pramod Viswanath
The paper introduces DP‑BR‑FedAvg, a federated learning framework that combines Gaussian‑mechanism differential privacy with a coordinate‑wise trimmed‑mean Byzantine‑robust aggregation rule. It is evaluated on a simulated cross‑institutional classification task for fraud and clinical‑risk scoring, showing that plain FedAvg fails when a quarter of twenty clients are Byzantine, while DP‑BR‑FedAvg recovers more signal and bounds privacy loss. The study demonstrates that privacy and robustness interact, and system design for regulated, adversarial, cross‑institutional settings must account for this interaction.
arXiv:2509. 10691v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Decentralized federated learning enables collaborative model training without a central server, but shared model updates can still leak sensitive information through inversion, reconstruction, and membership inference attacks.
By Fardin Jalil Piran, Zhiling Chen, Yang Zhang, Qianyu Zhou, Jiong Tang, Farhad Imani
arXiv:2609. 01945v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning enables multiple clients to train a shared model while keeping their local datasets isolated.
By Miguel Morona-M\'inguez, Fernando P\'erez-Gonz\'alez, Alberto Pedrouzo-Ulloa