arXiv AI By Shangbin Feng, Yike Wang, Weijia Shi, Luke Zettlemoyer, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov

Scaling Participation in Modular AI Systems

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 07812v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Humanity is a mosaic of multifaceted talents and needs, and any truly intelligent AI must reflect that richness.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 26

Diverse by Reasoning: Harnessing the Wisdom of LLM Crowds for Future Prediction

The paper introduces a behavior‑aware framework to build diverse crowds of large language models (LLMs) for future prediction. By analyzing reasoning traces on independent tasks, clustering models by behavioral similarity, and selecting representative medoids, the authors demonstrate that a small, well‑chosen crowd can outperform a larger, conventional voting ensemble. Experiments with 25 LLMs across multiple benchmarks show significant reductions in model calls and inference cost while improving prediction accuracy.

By Nirupam Chetlapalli, Yiming Liao, Min-Chun Chen, Keke Chen
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Improving LLM Interpretability with User-Centric Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

The paper proposes a user‑centric Chain‑of‑Thought (CoT) reasoning framework that structures LLM reasoning traces into self‑contained, verifiable steps using XML‑like tags. This design allows users to independently assess and correct the AI’s reasoning while preserving performance on mathematical reasoning tasks. User studies show that the approach improves perceived usefulness and ease of use compared to standard CoT.

By Philipp Schr\"oppel