arXiv AI By Catherine Ji, Vivek Myers, Joshua Lin, Alexandra Wingate, Sergey Levine, Benjamin Eysenbach

Scaling Empowered Agents

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces a scalable method for maximizing empowerment, defined as the number of executable skills an agent can perform from a given state. By linking skill learning to empowerment, the authors provide a recipe that works with any underlying skill learning approach, enabling large‑scale studies beyond traditional tabular settings. Experiments demonstrate that maximizing empowerment leads to emergent behaviors such as resource gathering, environment modification, and even building a house in the game Crafter.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 7

The Geometry of Empowerment

The paper "The Geometry of Empowerment" investigates how empowerment—an agent’s capacity to control its environment—relates to structurally central states that afford broad future access. By linking empowerment maximization with skill‑learning techniques, the authors develop new geometric frameworks for interpreting and analyzing empowerment. Their analyses resolve long‑standing questions about the relationship between empowerment and structural centrality, and they uncover differences between information‑based and reward‑based geometries, offering theoretical insights for scalable empowerment‑maximization methods.

By Catherine Ji, Vivek Myers, Sergey Levine, Benjamin Eysenbach
arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

Agent Skill Evaluation and Evolution: Frameworks and Benchmarks

The paper surveys the evolving field of agent skill evaluation and evolution, emphasizing the shift from isolated skill creation to automated, evaluation-driven development. It categorizes skill evolution into four paradigms—execution feedback, trajectory distillation, compression, and reinforcement learning—and analyzes six skill-centric benchmark categories to highlight gaps and trade-offs. The authors outline open research directions for building generalizable, efficient, and verifiably safe skill ecosystems.

By Kexin Ding, Yang Zhou, Can Jin, Feng Tong, Mu Zhou, Dimitris N. Metaxas
arXiv AI
Jul 8

When Assisting One Disempowers Another

arXiv:2511. 04177v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personal AI agents are increasingly deployed in shared environments, where their actions affect not just the primary user they are assisting, but bystanders who never consented to being affected by the system.

By Claire Yang, Claire Jie Zhang, Maya Cakmak, Max Kleiman-Weiner
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Agentic University: Collaborative Agents for Personalized Learning

The paper introduces Agentic University (AU), a Human‑Participatory Multi‑Agent Organization that lets learners act as organization members and collaborate with specialized agents to build a revisable Capability Program. This program links personal goals, multimodal learning activities, and layered assessment, using learner feedback and performance to guide future support. Evaluation shows that AU improves program organization, assessment design, and revision quality, yielding higher mean assessment gains and stronger cognitive support compared to baseline.

By Jingru Fan, Tianle Zhou, Yunjie Zhou, Zihao He, Yixuan Zhou, Kezhao Wu, Xinyu Zheng, Xiyuan Wang, Yuheng Wang, Zhi Li, Songhua Liu, Weinan E, Chen Qian
arXiv AI
Jun 17

A Framework for Evaluating Agentic Skills at Scale

arXiv:2606. 17819v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent skills -- structured, reusable knowledge artifacts that augment LLM agent capabilities -- have been rapidly adopted in industry, yet their cross-domain impact and use across commercial and open-source models remain under-studied, and no reusable methodology exists for evaluating an individual skill.

By Maksim Shaposhnikov, Nicolas Fortuin, Simon Stipcich, Maria I. Gorinova, Amy Heineike, Rob Willoughby