Multi-Agent Empowerment and Emergence of Complex Behavior in Groups
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608.28046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Collective behaviour in living systems is usually modelled as the outcome of a \emph{direct} social drive: agents are rewarded, or hard-wired, to ali...
arXiv:2511. 04177v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personal AI agents are increasingly deployed in shared environments, where their actions affect not just the primary user they are assisting, but bystanders who never consented to being affected by the system.
arXiv:2607. 12861v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) holds great potential for robot swarms, but the black-box nature of neural policies complicates strategic analysis, limiting multi-robot applications.
Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) holds great potential for robot swarms, but the black-box nature of neural policies complicates strategic analysis, limiting multi-robot applications. Furthermore, complex swarm behaviors can surprisingly emerge from simple rewards without explicit aggregation incentives.
arXiv:2609.17325v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Biological cells can be viewed as individual, interacting agents whose collective dynamics give rise to adaptive behaviour at multiple levels of organi...
The paper argues that observing only behavior is insufficient to identify social norms in large language model (LLM) societies. It introduces an evaluation framework that also measures agents’ reported empirical and normative expectations, revealing that expectation elicitation boosts cooperation, social learning stabilizes behavior, and social selection identifies cooperators but offers limited reinforcement. The study shows that similar cooperative outcomes can stem from distinct underlying mechanisms and that expectations can be used to attribute each mechanism’s contribution.