arXiv Machine Learning By Tim Treis, Nikita Moshkov, Johan Fredin Haslum, Shantanu Singh, Fabian J. Theis

Same Encoder, Different Winner: A Paired-View Framework for Cell Painting Encoder Evaluation

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces CP‑BG‑Bench, a paired‑view evaluation framework for Cell Painting vision encoders that fixes a central cell across four matched views (raw crop, segmented, and density‑augmented variants). Using this framework on three datasets and three encoders, the authors show that standard single‑metric rankings (e.g., replicate mAP) vary systematically across protocols, revealing disagreements along axes of cell versus background, morphology versus context, and within‑study versus across‑batch performance. The study demonstrates that segmented views can outperform crops in certain tasks and that background‑driven gains are largely determined by experimental design rather than encoder choice.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 11

Resolution Meets Reduction: Efficient Visual Context for 3D Radiology Report Generation

arXiv:2608. 08713v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models offer a promising path toward automating radiology report generation, but applying them to full 3D CT volumes poses substantial computational challenges.

By Jonathan Suprijadi, Raphael Stock, Moritz Langenberg, David Zimmerer, Kim-Celine Kahl, Stefan Denner, Yannick Kirchhoff, Karol Gotkowski, Maximilian Rokuss, Jeremias Traub, Tassilo Wald, Constantin Ulrich, Klaus Maier-Hein