arXiv Computer Vision By Shaoliang Yang, Jun Wang

SafeRestore: Detector-Relative Risk Certificates for Selective Industrial Image Restoration

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

SafeRestore introduces a framework for certifying when an industrial image restoration should be automatically returned to a detector or require human review. It ranks five restoration candidates using action‑specific fitted scores, selects a threshold gate on tuning data, and evaluates the gate on a separate certification sample with two one‑sided exact binomial bounds—one for evidence‑loss incidents and one for excess‑activation incidents. In a retrospective study of 4,591 Carinthia‑S images, the protocol demonstrates auditable risk‑coverage behavior, with varying pass rates across different policies and morphologies.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

How Many Categories Are Enough? Distribution-Free Certification Limits for Few-Shot Anomaly Thresholds

The paper investigates how many normal samples are required to reliably set an alarm threshold for few‑shot anomaly detectors, focusing on distribution‑free certification limits. Using a frozen DINOv2 PCA residual ranker on 15 MVTec and 12 VisA categories, the authors show that simple leave‑one‑image‑out calibration is limited by resolution and shift, leading to empirical false‑alarm rates far above the nominal level. They derive a category‑count feasibility calculus, demonstrating that at least 14, 29, and 59 independent category draws are needed for 95% upper confidence bounds at α=0.20, 0.10, and 0.05, and propose the CRESS protocol to split source categories into reference, proposal, and certification roles. whyItMatters":"The study provides concrete numerical thresholds for the amount of source evidence needed to guarantee reliable anomaly detection in new categories, informing practical deployment of few‑shot detectors."

By Gia Huy Thai, Nguyen Thai Anh
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Common-Witness Certificates and Sharp Feature Bounds for Counterfactual Image Auditing

The paper introduces a framework for auditing image editors that can satisfy regional plausibility constraints while lacking a single latent explanation for the entire output. It defines a common witness grade and witness nerve to formalize local-to-global failures, separating auditing from causal identification. Using Helly-type arguments and a blocker-hypergraph formula, the authors provide short incompatibility certificates, sharp partial-identification bounds for specified image features, and finite-sample outer coverage of identified intervals, validated through controlled MNIST, Morpho-MNIST, and smallNORB experiments.

By Usef Faghihi, Amir Saki
arXiv AI
Oct 19

Audit-First VAPO: Risk-Certified Selective Updates under Imperfect Verification

The paper introduces Audit-First VAPO, a method that separates directional admission from magnitude control for selective updates under imperfect verification. It employs an observation-only accept‑appeal‑abstain policy with a finite secondary‑verification budget, freezing the action trace before clean labels are added, and uses finite‑sample bounds to certify harmful risk, coverage, and verifier‑call rate. Experiments on Qwen3.5‑0.8B and GSM8K show that RC‑VAPO achieves high accuracy while maintaining low selected harmful risk and modest verifier cost compared to baseline methods.

By Miaobo Hu, Shuhao Hu, Xiaobo Guo, Xin Wang, Bokun Wang, Rui Chen, Daren Zha