arXiv AI
Safe to Resume? Breaking Execution Continuity of Agent Execution via Rollback
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 31
MemSecBench: Tracking Agent Memory Poisoning from Persistence to Consequence and Repair
arXiv:2607. 27080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory systems allow agents to retain and reuse information from past interactions, but they can also let malicious content persist.
arXiv AI
2d ago
SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systems
arXiv:2609.00595v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safe agents can fail together. Multi-agent LLM systems (MAS) move information, state, decisions, and authority across principal boundaries, creating...
arXiv AI
Jun 12
The Containment Gap: How Deployed Agentic AI Frameworks Fail Public-Facing Safety Requirements
arXiv:2606. 12797v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic large language model systems that autonomously invoke tools, maintain persistent memory, and execute multi-step plans are increasingly deployed in public-facing domains, including government services, healthcare triage, and financial advising.
arXiv AI
Aug 26
Rebuild Dossier: Mechanically-Enforced Specs for Agentic App Rebuilds, and What Model-Tier Failures Reveal
The paper introduces rebuild‑dossier, an open‑source tool that locks an application’s real interface before code is written and enforces one‑test‑at‑a‑time building through automated checks. In experiments, a compliant agent failed a held‑back test while a rule‑breaking agent passed, showing that a passing test suite can be gamed. The study also demonstrates that the automated check mechanism, rather than interface‑locking alone, is crucial for reliable rebuilds, and that multi‑level verification catches errors that single‑level checks miss.
arXiv AI
Jul 8
Proof of Execution: Runtime Verification for Governed AI Agent Actions
arXiv:2607. 05397v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent systems increasingly execute rather than advise.
arXiv AI
Aug 5
Designing for Doubt: The Case for Informed Abstention in Autonomous Agents
arXiv:2606. 02965v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As large language models gain tool access and are deployed as autonomous agents capable of editing records, executing transactions, and modifying infrastructure, we still evaluate them based on the sole metric of task completion.