AI agents are usually evaluated by whether they complete a task. In interactive service settings, a successful agent can still frustrate users by asking repeated questions, performing redundant search...
arXiv:2606. 21140v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Rapid advances in large language models have improved the task-solving capabilities of command-line-interface (CLI)-based agents, whose CLIs determine how models invoke tools, maintain interaction history, and recover from failures.
By Han Chi, Jiaxin Qi, Yan Cui, Baisheng Lai, Jianqiang Huang
arXiv:2605.27995v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agents have shown strong capabilities in using external tools to solve complex tasks. However, existing evaluation...
By Kou Shi, Ziao Zhang, Shiting Huang, Avery Nie, Zhen Fang, Qiuchen Wang, Lin Chen, Huaian Chen, Zehui Chen, Feng Zhao
arXiv:2606. 15508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-augmented large language model agents increasingly operate over large tool libraries, but existing evaluations often focus on whether a model can call a tool correctly rather than how the visible tool menu shapes reliability, efficiency, and safety-relevant risk exposure.
By Rahul Suresh Babu, Laxmipriya Ganesh Iyer
arXiv:2512.24565v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as autonomous agents, and their utilization of external tools via the Model Context Protocol...
By Zixiang Liu, Wenrui Liu, Elsie Dai, Wenhan Yu, Lei Yu, Tong Yang, Jinjun Han, Hong Gao
arXiv:2609.06059v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: As large language models evolve from question-answering systems into general-purpose agents, evaluation must move beyond static answer correctness to a...
By Yu Liu, Zhilin Liu, Zhiwei Yang, Shaojie Zhang, Zheyuan Deng, Tingwei Huang, Zhenbo Luo, Lei Jiang, Yanbing Liu, Pei Fu