arXiv Computation and Language

$\tau$-Emotion-Bench: Exposing the Interaction Fragility of LLM Agents through Real-World User Emotions

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 8

ToolRACER: A Robust Agentic Conversation Emulation Resource for Agent Training and Evaluation

arXiv:2610.09163v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Task-oriented conversational agents remain fragile under real world conversation scenarios as they rarely follow a predictable script, especially when...

By Arkajyoti Chakraborty, Aryan Tayal, Ishika Agarwal, Tanner Sorensen, Justin Chiu, Alessandro Di Bari, Neha Gupta, Andreas Stolcke
arXiv AI
3d ago

Evolving Self-tuning Benchmarks for Long-Horizon Tool Use

The paper introduces TURTLE, an Unsupervised Environment Design framework that evolves tool‑use tasks for AI assistants by using a proposer, solver, and feedback generator powered by large language models. TURTLE automatically generates self‑tuning, long‑horizon benchmarks that increase task difficulty, diversity, and failure modes across multiple applications. Experiments on AppWorld, τ‑Bench, and AutomationBench demonstrate significant gains in hard task percentages and broader reasoning challenges.

By Hyunji Alex Nam, Michael Dennis, Natasha Jaques, Minsuk Chang
arXiv AI
Sep 17

RideWay: Benchmarking Efficient Task Completion for Tool-Using Language Agents

RideWay is a new benchmark that evaluates ride‑hailing language agents not just on task completion but on interaction efficiency. It introduces the Efficiency Utility metric, which penalizes agents for excessive tool calls and user‑facing turns relative to a task‑specific reference effort, with human preferences used to calibrate the penalties. Across 58 tasks and 24 models, the metric shows that extra dialogue is penalized more heavily than extra tool use, and it achieves high accuracy in distinguishing trajectories that differ in turns but struggles when differences are only in tool calls.

By Qingnuan Han, Boli Fang, Mingzhi Hou, Claire Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 30

AnyAct: Universal Action for Self-Evolving Agents

AnyAct introduces a universal action layer that consolidates diverse tool capabilities into a self‑evolving action space for AI agents operating in open‑world environments. It tackles the scale dilemma, tool non‑stationarity, and heterogeneous feedback by using hierarchical progressive retrieval and test‑time reliability evolution, while a heterogeneous observation grounding module unifies multi‑modal feedback. Evaluations on LiveMCPBench and the newly created OSMCP benchmark show state‑of‑the‑art performance, with significant gains in task success rate and reduced execution steps, especially for models with limited native capabilities.

By Lingrui Xu, Yangqin Jiang, Jiachang Zhang, Xubin Ren, Chao Huang
arXiv AI
Oct 9

MIMESIS: Learning User Simulators as Training Environments for Interactive Agents

MIMESIS is a user simulator designed to train interactive language agents by mimicking real user behavior. It is trained on human conversations with explicit reasoning supervision and incorporates 13 realistic behavioral patterns. Experiments show that agents trained with MIMESIS outperform those trained with GPT-5.5 across multiple unseen simulators, and the proposed Coached On-Policy Self-Distillation further improves agent performance by providing dense, token-level supervision.

By Hoang Phan, Dat Huynh, Andrey Zhmoginov, Qi Zeng, Wancen Mu, Yue Cao, Shengjie Bi, Yun He, Changdae Oh, Deren Lei
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Efficient Test-Time Adaptation through Human-AI Interaction

The paper introduces Test-Time Adaptation through Human‑Agent Interaction (TAHI), a method that uses iterative human feedback to adapt AI agents to individual users’ criteria. By integrating cross‑session interaction data into agent context and weights, and building an evolving rubric module, the authors demonstrate that agents can improve task success by 4.5–20.9% after only a few interactions. The evolving rubric also serves as a scalable annotation tool, detecting 16.0–22.3% more failures than language models or humans alone, and personalized agents can even generalize improvements up to 8.8% across users.

By Zora Zhiruo Wang, Apurva Gandhi, Rulin Shao, Aspen Chen, Jonas Mueller, Zhiqi Liang, Jett Chen, Michael Ryan, Qianou Ma, Luxi He, Zhoujun Cheng, Andre He, Seungone Kim, Jiayi Geng, Mingqian Zheng, Weiwei Sun, Zheyuan Zhang, Xinran Zhao, Yike Wang, Abe Hou, Liwei Jiang, Pang Wei Koh, Diyi Yang, Graham Neubig, Daniel Fried
arXiv AI
Jun 16

ToolMenuBench: Benchmarking Tool-Menu Filtering Strategies for Reliable and Efficient LLM Agents

arXiv:2606. 15508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-augmented large language model agents increasingly operate over large tool libraries, but existing evaluations often focus on whether a model can call a tool correctly rather than how the visible tool menu shapes reliability, efficiency, and safety-relevant risk exposure.

By Rahul Suresh Babu, Laxmipriya Ganesh Iyer