The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2607. 25271v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Classical compute-optimal scaling laws assume an unbounded supply of fresh pretraining data, yet pretraining is increasingly entering a regime in which compute grows faster than the availability of high-quality data.
Classical compute-optimal scaling laws assume an unbounded supply of fresh pretraining data, yet pretraining is increasingly entering a regime in which compute grows faster than the availability of high-quality data. We propose Compute-Data (CD) scaling laws, a unified framework that bridges compute-optimal scaling, where data scales freely with compute, and data-optimal scaling, where the corpus is fixed while compute can grow without bound.
The paper introduces a new closed‑form scaling law that extends Chinchilla’s original formula to handle data‑constrained regimes. It decomposes loss into undercapacity, undertraining, and overfitting components, saturating between an irreducible loss and an uninformed baseline. The authors validate the model on diverse architectures and domains, achieving state‑of‑the‑art RMSE across multiple LLM scaling‑law grids and enabling cost‑aware training allocations.
arXiv:2611.05539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs can repair noisy OCR transcripts of historical documents, but they also change text that was already correct. We propose EditVeto, a veto gate pla...
arXiv:2603. 11784v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As scaling laws push the training of frontier large language models (LLMs) toward ever-growing data requirements, training pipelines are approaching a regime where much of the publicly available online text may be consumed.
The paper introduces a novel patching strategy for byte‑level language models, called novelty patching, which starts a new patch when upcoming bytes are unlikely to repeat recent context, inspired by LZ77 compression. Experiments on a 1.9 GB math corpus show that novelty patching improves final‑answer accuracy from 47 % to 72 % at 12 M parameters and raises computed‑result accuracy from 21 % to 57 % at 50 M parameters, while having limited impact on prose and source code. The study also analyzes patch boundary distributions and reports several failed approaches, such as typed uncertainty and context‑aware novelty prediction. whyItMatters":"The findings demonstrate that a simple, data‑driven patching rule can significantly enhance the performance of byte‑level models on tasks involving computed results, offering a practical improvement for large language models that process raw text without explicit labels."