The paper introduces a new closed‑form scaling law that extends Chinchilla’s original formula to handle data‑constrained regimes. It decomposes loss into undercapacity, undertraining, and overfitting components, saturating between an irreducible loss and an uninformed baseline. The authors validate the model on diverse architectures and domains, achieving state‑of‑the‑art RMSE across multiple LLM scaling‑law grids and enabling cost‑aware training allocations.
arXiv:2607. 25271v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Classical compute-optimal scaling laws assume an unbounded supply of fresh pretraining data, yet pretraining is increasingly entering a regime in which compute grows faster than the availability of high-quality data.
arXiv:2607. 21866v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prior classical-ML learning-curve work fits power laws to tree, linear, and kernel models on tabular data, but at small scale: typically one curve, one team, a handful of cells.
Classical compute-optimal scaling laws assume an unbounded supply of fresh pretraining data, yet pretraining is increasingly entering a regime in which compute grows faster than the availability of high-quality data. We propose Compute-Data (CD) scaling laws, a unified framework that bridges compute-optimal scaling, where data scales freely with compute, and data-optimal scaling, where the corpus is fixed while compute can grow without bound.
The paper introduces Coupled Scaling, a framework that links neural scaling laws to the relationship between task structure and the geometry that an architecture‑optimization system can access. It shows that finite‑budget scaling depends on how well the system’s representational support aligns with the task’s energy distribution, deriving residual exponents that vary with architectural coverage and tail decay. The authors propose tests to verify whether static task‑relevant geometry tracks loss and whether multiscale geometry follows coupling‑specific exponent ordering, suggesting a factorial audit of emergence trajectories to isolate geometry from scaling fits.
arXiv:2606. 01155v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scaling laws for dense LLMs under infinite data are well explored, but how sparsity interacts with limited data is not.
arXiv:2512. 22088v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The scaling law, a cornerstone of Large Language Model (LLM) development, predicts improvements in model performance with increasing computational resources.
arXiv:2608.23573v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A trained transformer's weight magnitudes can be summarized by a two-parameter Weibull distribution whose shape $k \approx 1.2$ is stable across layers...
arXiv:2605. 29548v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Larger models learn tasks smaller models do not.
arXiv:2608. 20061v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures significantly expand model capacity without a proportional increase in computational cost.
arXiv:2606. 06888v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Classical scaling laws for language model pretraining balance model size against training dataset size under a fixed compute budget, assuming abundant data and a single pass over the corpus.
arXiv:2607. 23777v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The discovery of scaling laws has motivated training neural networks on ever increasing quantities of data.
arXiv:2609.37899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Zero-order optimization (ZO) trains without backpropagation, making it relevant to forward-only hardware and non-differentiable loss, but its gradient...