The paper introduces UECR-GRPO, a method that unifies on‑policy distillation and verifier‑based reinforcement learning for mathematical reasoning. It combines verifier rewards and teacher‑derived log‑ratios into a single KL‑regularized objective (Path‑Utility Unification) and then redistributes credit at the token level using entropy‑calibrated redistribution, preserving total task credit. Experiments on five benchmarks show that UECR‑GRPO improves average accuracy by up to 0.89 percentage points over the best baseline for both Qwen3‑1.7B and Qwen3‑4B students.
By Jie Zhang, Jingxiao Yang, Zhehao Huang, Yuhang Liu, Xiaolin Huang
The paper proposes a reward‑density principle for language‑model post‑training: sparse sequence‑level rewards are best for exploring and discovering new behaviors in a strong teacher, while dense token‑level teacher supervision is optimal for compressing that behavior into a smaller deployment model. The authors validate this rule with a four‑stage workflow—teacher RL, forward‑KL warmup, on‑policy distillation, and optional post‑bridge student RL—showing that an RL‑improved 8B teacher distilled through a dense bridge outperforms direct GRPO on a 1.7B student across math and code benchmarks. Ablation studies confirm each stage’s contribution, and the approach generalizes to Llama and Qwen models, offering a practical guideline for allocating scarce labeled data.
By Yuanda Xu, Hejian Sang, Zhengze Zhou, Ran He, Zhipeng Wang, Alborz Geramifard
The paper introduces a recursive self-improvement framework for language models that replaces an external teacher with a frozen copy of the student, enabling dynamic co-evolution (DCE) and self-refined concise learning (SRCL). DCE allows the privileged teacher to evolve alongside the student, while SRCL trains on shorter, verified rewrites to reduce verbosity. Experiments show that the combined DCE+SRCL approach outperforms traditional on‑policy self‑distillation across multiple model sizes and math benchmarks, achieving significant accuracy gains and shorter outputs.
By Shangjian Yin, Zehao Zhao, Kavosh Asadi, Rui Liu, Yuchen Lu, Shike Mei, Hang Cui, Luke Simon, Zhouxing Shi, Hamed Firooz
arXiv:2607. 05394v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a powerful recipe for improving language-model reasoning, but it is expensive to repeat on every new strong model because the target model must generate many rollouts during training.
By Shiyuan Feng, Huan-ang Gao, Haohan Chi, Hanlin Wu, Zhilong Zhang, Zheng Jiang, Bingxiang He, Wei-Ying Ma, Ya-Qin Zhang, Hao Zhou
arXiv:2607. 29209v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) broadcasts a single response-level reward to every token, while on-policy distillation (OPD) scores each token against a stronger teacher for a dense advantage but caps performance at teacher quality and discourages exploration beyond it.
By Yifan Ding, Xincheng Wei, Yoshua Y. Li, Ziheng Li, Yuquan Lu, Siyu Zhang, Dongsheng Ma, Rongxiang Weng, Xunliang Cai, Yun Chen
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a powerful recipe for improving language-model reasoning, but it is expensive to repeat on every new strong model because the target model must generate many rollouts during training. As models scale, post-training itself becomes a bottleneck.