arXiv Computation and Language By Baichuan Li, Junyi Yao, Zihao Zheng

Remember, Verify, or Ask? Cross-Family Evaluation of Memory Commitment in LLM Agents

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

arXiv:2608. 19564v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persistent memory can personalize an LLM agent, but an incorrect durable update can silently distort future behavior.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 1

MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory

Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators. However, memory is not always beneficial: retrieved memories often induce a critical issue of sycophancy, causing agents to over-align with the user at the cost of factual accuracy or objective reasoning.

arXiv AI
3d ago

The Memory Trust Gap: Capability-Dependent Failures in Persistent-Memory Agents

The paper investigates how persistent memory in AI agents can lead to over‑trust in stale facts, creating a "Memory Trust Gap" that worsens as model capability increases. Using a benchmark with Benefit and Safety suites across Qwen3 models of varying sizes, the authors show that larger models are more prone to harmful over‑trust, especially when metadata is absent or misleading. They also demonstrate that mitigation strategies such as exposing metadata or pre‑resolving conflicts improve accuracy, but the effectiveness depends on model size and dataset.

By Jundong Hu, Shekar Ramachandran
arXiv AI
2d ago

Plan Pointers and Record-Directive Form in Budgeted Verification of Inherited Agent Memory

The paper reports on a series of experiments examining how different forms of directives—such as record pointers, criteria, or combinations—affect an agent’s choice of archived source records when it inherits six one-line memories. Across twelve registered studies involving 14,760 attempts on a single instrument lineage, the authors measured the impact of various directive formats on six direct-provider models, nine OpenRouter-served models, and several Claude and Opus 5 models, noting differences in performance metrics and replication outcomes. The results are purely descriptive, detailing the effects of exact edits on fixed panels with registered intervals and no claim of underlying mechanisms.

By Kazuki Nakayashiki