arXiv AI By Chang Liu, Deliang Ding

What to Admit and How to Present: Governing Persistent Memory in LLM Agents

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces two inference‑time designs—factor‑compiled admission (FC) and permission‑semantic admission (PS)—to govern persistent memory in large language model agents without retraining. FC evaluates entire memory entries, while PS decomposes entries into typed units, both using deterministic policies to decide what recalled information enters the working context and how it is expressed. Experiments on a development suite and an external benchmark show that FC and PS reduce failure rates and cross‑domain leakage compared to verbatim injection, though they increase personalization failures and do not meet all preregistered criteria.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 7

The Right Memory in the Wrong Context: Verifying Retrieval Admissibility in Long-Term Agent Memory

The paper presents a retrieval‑admissibility verification framework for long‑term memory agents, classifying each memory‑query pair as admissible, inadmissible, or unresolved. It evaluates the framework on public benchmarks (RHELM and MemOps), showing improved anchor recall and reduced exact similarity errors, while also revealing that existing verifiers miss certain inadmissible exposures. The study highlights the need for separate checks on candidate support, admissibility, prompt exposure, and answer disclosure to ensure safe memory retrieval.

By Zi Wang, Xingqiao Wang, Emmanuel Addai, Devika Ambekar, Xiaowei Xu
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Deployment-Time Memorization in Foundation-Model Agents

arXiv:2606. 10062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation-model agents are increasingly long-lived systems that remember users across interactions, making memorization an explicit deployment-time function rather than solely a property of model weights.

By Lei (Rachel), Chen, Guilin Zhang, Kai Zhao, Dalmo Cirne, Andy Olsen, Xu Chu, Zeke Miller, Alet Blanken, Amine Anoun, Jerry Ting
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Control-Plane Placement Shapes Forgetting: An Architectural Study of Agent Memory Across Thirteen System Configurations

arXiv:2606. 15903v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Where an LLM sits in an agent memory pipeline -- between the recall plane that retrieves stored facts (extensively benchmarked) and the control plane that mutates them via supersede, release, purge (largely untested) -- shapes which forgetting failure modes the system recovers.

By Dongxu Yang
arXiv AI
Oct 5

DyadMem: A Long-Term Memory Benchmark of How Agents Work with Users

DyadMem introduces a new benchmark for evaluating how long‑term agents remember user‑specific relational information, called User‑conditioned Relational Agent Memory (URAM). The dataset contains 3,065 episodes, 50,961 sessions, and 61,210 QA pairs, with detailed annotations for memory capture, update, and recall across multi‑session trajectories. Experiments on 20 models show strong performance in a gold‑memory setting but a significant drop in full‑pipeline QA, highlighting gaps in current LLM memory capabilities.

By Yifei Tao, Xinyu Zhong, Henry Hengyuan Zhao, Fanyi Wang, Tengda Guo, Wentao Qiu, Ying Wang, Liujian Tang