arXiv:2607. 01071v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators.
By Zhishang Xiang, Zerui Chen, Yunbo Tang, Zhimin Wei, Ruqin Ning, Yujie Lin, Qinggang Zhang, Jinsong Su
arXiv:2609.09115v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long horizon Large Language Model (LLM) agents rely on external memory systems to preserve user preferences and task knowledge across extended interact...
By Boyu Yang, Jiazheng Sun, Zilong Lu, Zhi Qiu, Xin Peng, Jun Zheng
The paper introduces MemProbe, a framework inspired by cognitive science to evaluate stability-plasticity tradeoffs in agent memory systems. It offers four experimental paradigms—interference, misinformation, consolidation strength, and reconsolidation window—to manipulate memory updates, preservation, and uncertainty. Using a 56-episode diagnostic suite, the authors evaluate six incremental memory systems, revealing that similar overall scores can mask distinct behavioral profiles in how memories are updated, preserved, attributed, and temporally organized.
By Jiaqi Ding, Guorong Wu
arXiv:2607. 12385v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A significant challenge in agentic AI is prospective memory: the ability to execute an intention at a specific future cue or state while other activities are ongoing.
By Genglin Liu, Saadia Gabriel
arXiv:2605. 18421v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents mainly evaluate reasoning, planning, and execution.
By Yuyao Wang, Zhongjian Zhang, Mo Chi, Kaichi Yu, Yuhan Li, Miao Peng, Bing Tong, Chen Zhang, Yan Zhou, Jia Li
The paper introduces StructMemEval, a benchmark designed to assess how well large language model (LLM) agents can organize their long‑term memory rather than merely recall facts. It compiles tasks that humans typically solve by structuring knowledge—such as transaction ledgers, to‑do lists, and trees—and evaluates agents on these. Experiments show that simple retrieval‑augmented LLMs struggle with such organization tasks, while memory‑augmented agents perform better when explicitly prompted to structure their memory, yet many modern LLMs still fail to recognize memory structures without prompting.
By Alina Shutova, Alexandra Olenina, Ivan Vinogradov, Anton Sinitsin
MemoryArena is a new evaluation gym that benchmarks agent memory in interdependent multi‑session tasks. Unlike prior benchmarks that test memorization or single‑session action in isolation, MemoryArena requires agents to acquire memory while interacting with the environment and then use that memory to guide future decisions across a range of tasks such as web navigation, planning, information search, and formal reasoning. The benchmark reveals that agents excelling on existing long‑context memory tests perform poorly here, highlighting a gap in current memory evaluation methods.
By Zexue He, Yu Wang, Churan Zhi, Yuanzhe Hu, Tzu-Ping Chen, Lang Yin, Ze Chen, Tong Arthur Wu, Siru Ouyang, Zihan Wang, Jiaxin Pei, Julian McAuley, Yejin Choi, Alex Pentland
arXiv:2507. 05257v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents primarily focus on evaluating reasoning, planning, and execution capabilities, while another critical component-memory, encompassing how agents memorize, update, and retrieve long-term information-is under-evaluated due to the lack of benchmarks.
By Yuanzhe Hu, Yu Wang, Julian McAuley
arXiv:2606. 06054v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personal AI agents increasingly rely on long-term memory to provide persistent personalization across sessions.
By Jiawen Zhang, Kejia Chen, Jiachen Ma, Yangfan Hu, Lipeng He, Yechao Zhang, Jian Liu, Xiaohu Yang, Tianwei Zhang, Ruoxi Jia
arXiv:2606. 17328v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly maintain long-term memory of user facts across sessions.
By Xianxuan Long, Zhikai Chen, Shenglai Zeng, Shouren Wang, Kai Guo, Jiliang Tang
The paper investigates how agent memory contributes to reliable handling of unanswerable questions (UAQs) within a unified Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework. Four memory methods were evaluated across three UAQ datasets and two base models, revealing that memory can improve UAQ performance in selective settings but the gains are fragile under dataset shift. Procedural and rule-based memories, especially when combined with complementary behavioral signals, provide the most reliable support, indicating that effective UAQ memory relies more on transferable behavioral guidance than on sheer volume of stored experience.
By Chuanyuan Tan, Junjie Yu, Yuxin Wang, Yining Zheng, Xipeng Qiu, Wenliang Chen
Long-term memory has become increasingly important for LLM agents that operate across extended interactions and evolving task contexts. Recent memory systems have made past experiences more persistent, compact, and retrievable, but retrieval alone does not ensure that a memory provides valid evidence for the current query.