arXiv Machine Learning By Jonathan Allcock, Joao F. Doriguello, G\'abor Ivanyos, Miklos Santha

Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 30

Optimal Quantum-Classical Separations for Exact Learning

arXiv:2609.38073v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study exact learning with membership queries for concept classes $\mathcal C\subseteq\{0,1\}^N$, focusing on the relationships among their determi...

By Srinivasan Arunachalam, Amin Shiraz Gilani, Nikhil S. Mande
arXiv Statistics ML
Oct 1

Advantage of Sample Complexity in Quantum PAC Learning Requires Inverse Access to State-Preparation Unitaries

The paper investigates whether having only forward access to a state-preparation unitary—without its inverse—can reduce the number of queries needed for quantum PAC learning. By analyzing worst-case scenarios over all compatible unitaries and finite dimensions, the authors prove that the optimal forward-only query complexities for realizable and agnostic learning are θ((d+log(1/δ))/ε) and θ((d+log(1/δ))/ε²), respectively, matching classical and quantum-copy bounds. These results demonstrate that forward-only access offers no asymptotic advantage over classical data or quantum copies, highlighting the essential role of inverse access for any improvement in the realizable setting.

By Natsuto Isogai, Satoshi Yoshida, Mio Murao