We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory. Here an algorithm sequentially receives copies of an unknown $n$-qubit state, but may keep only $k$ qubits of coherent quantum memory between measurements.
arXiv:2510.06848v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Bell sampling is a simple yet powerful tool based on measuring two copies of a quantum state in the Bell basis, and has found applications in...
By Jonathan Allcock, Joao F. Doriguello, G\'abor Ivanyos, Miklos Santha
arXiv:2610. 02068v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: How complex can the responses of a quantum device become as it runs longer with a fixed internal memory?
By Yibin Wang
The paper investigates whether having only forward access to a state-preparation unitary—without its inverse—can reduce the number of queries needed for quantum PAC learning. By analyzing worst-case scenarios over all compatible unitaries and finite dimensions, the authors prove that the optimal forward-only query complexities for realizable and agnostic learning are θ((d+log(1/δ))/ε) and θ((d+log(1/δ))/ε²), respectively, matching classical and quantum-copy bounds. These results demonstrate that forward-only access offers no asymptotic advantage over classical data or quantum copies, highlighting the essential role of inverse access for any improvement in the realizable setting.
By Natsuto Isogai, Satoshi Yoshida, Mio Murao
arXiv:2606. 12211v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A central principle in quantum machine learning is that an ansatz should be expressive enough to represent the quantum data of interest.
By Jeongho Bang, Kyoungho Cho, Jeongwoo Jae
The paper investigates whether a learner or tester with limited resources can improve performance by interacting with an untrusted, resource‑unconstrained party. It shows that for many scenarios, classical interaction offers no advantage, especially for memory‑constrained quantum algorithms. However, when quantum communication is permitted, interactive proof protocols enable memory‑constrained quantum verifiers to achieve significant gains through delegation.
By Matthias C. Caro, Jens Eisert, Marcel Hinsche, Marios Ioannou, Alexander Nietner, Ryan Sweke
arXiv:2606. 20344v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models have scaled to unprecedented sizes, making training across distributed devices the de facto standard in the field.
By Mar\'ia Gragera Garc\'es, Lirand\"e Pira
Given that quantum computers are naturally suited to simulate the behavior of quantum many-body systems, an immediate question arises: can one formulate physically motivated quantum machine learning (QML) tasks that exhibit learning separations? We address this problem by studying the learnability of quantum many-body dynamics from the perspective of probably approximately correct (PAC)-learning.
arXiv:2609.05718v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We study state tomography when each measurement acts on at most $k$ fresh copies and no quantum memory is retained between blocks. We prove a lower b...
By Ufuk Keskin, Jason Luo, Mahbod Majid, Matthew Radzihovsky
arXiv:2608. 11066v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We prove inference-time quantum coordination advantages for specified AI state-tracking tasks.
By Ming Yang
arXiv:2607. 06472v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Given that quantum computers are naturally suited to simulate the behavior of quantum many-body systems, an immediate question arises: can one formulate physically motivated quantum machine learning (QML) tasks that exhibit learning separations?
By Rahul Bandyopadhyay, Riccardo Molteni, Jens Eisert, Vedran Dunjko, Sofiene Jerbi
arXiv:2606. 02655v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: External regret certifies stability only against replacing one's behavior by a fixed alternative.
By Sohail Sarkar